Re: zsmalloc: support compaction

[Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:11:51PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Minchan Kim,
> 
> The patch 312fcae22703: "zsmalloc: support compaction" from Apr 15,
> 2015, leads to the following static checker warning:
> 
> 	mm/zsmalloc.c:1521 obj_malloc()
> 	warn: 'OBJ_ALLOCATED_TAG' is a shifter (not for '|=').
> 
> mm/zsmalloc.c
>   1510  static unsigned long obj_malloc(struct size_class *class,
>   1511                                  struct zspage *zspage, unsigned long handle)
>   1512  {
>   1513          int i, nr_page, offset;
>   1514          unsigned long obj;
>   1515          struct link_free *link;
>   1516  
>   1517          struct page *m_page;
>   1518          unsigned long m_offset;
>   1519          void *vaddr;
>   1520  
>   1521          handle |= OBJ_ALLOCATED_TAG;
>                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> It's weird to use the same define for a bit number
> 
>   1522          obj = get_freeobj(zspage);
>   1523  
>   1524          offset = obj * class->size;
>   1525          nr_page = offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>   1526          m_offset = offset & ~PAGE_MASK;
>   1527          m_page = get_first_page(zspage);
>   1528  
>   1529          for (i = 0; i < nr_page; i++)
>   1530                  m_page = get_next_page(m_page);
>   1531  
>   1532          vaddr = kmap_atomic(m_page);
>   1533          link = (struct link_free *)vaddr + m_offset / sizeof(*link);
>   1534          set_freeobj(zspage, link->next >> OBJ_ALLOCATED_TAG);
>                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> And also a bit shifter.  TAG normally implies it is a bit and not a
> shift?

Thanks for the report, Dan!