From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: do not allow access outside of unmap_pool
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:35:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160607060519.GF16910@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463486446-13890-1-git-send-email-colin.king@canonical.com>
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 01:00:46PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> When CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE_RAID is defined, unmap_pool[] is just 1
> element in size, however, allows orders of 2..8 to access
> outside unmap_pool and returns an invalid address. Ensure
> we fall into the default path and report a BUG() when
> CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE_RAID is defined and order is out of range.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> index 8c9f45f..6027e66 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> @@ -1100,12 +1100,14 @@ static struct dmaengine_unmap_pool *__get_unmap_pool(int nr)
> switch (order) {
> case 0 ... 1:
> return &unmap_pool[0];
> + #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE_RAID)
Okay if CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE_RAID is enabled (m or y) then IS_ENABLED
return 1, so we will go inside and not fall into default. And I though
by changelog that you want it to go to default in CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE_RAID
is defined!
What did I miss...
> case 2 ... 4:
> return &unmap_pool[1];
> case 5 ... 7:
> return &unmap_pool[2];
> case 8:
> return &unmap_pool[3];
> + #endif
> default:
> BUG();
> return NULL;
> --
> 2.8.1
>
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-07 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-17 12:00 [PATCH] dmaengine: do not allow access outside of unmap_pool Colin King
2016-06-07 6:05 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-08-23 9:24 Xulin Sun
2016-08-23 9:51 ` Colin Ian King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160607060519.GF16910@localhost \
--to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.