From: panand@redhat.com (Pratyush Anand)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Support for unaligned watchpoints in arm/arm64
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 12:25:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160607065520.GD13643@dhcppc6> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160531123827.GF24936@arm.com>
On 31/05/2016:01:38:27 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 05:04:46PM +0100, Pavel Labath wrote:
> > Hello all,
>
> Hi Pavel,
>
> > I've been wondering if there are any plans about adding support for
> > unaligned watchpoints to the kernel. It seems quite a shame that
> > applications are not able not use them, even though the hardware
> > should support that feature.
>
> I'm actually coming round to the idea of ditching the perf hw_breakpoint
> mechanism entirely and simply writing a ptrace back-end that can expose
> the hardware features directly to userspace. The two issues with this
> are:
>
> (1) It's a fair amount of work
So, by the time this new interface would come, probably we can consider a fixup
like following to resolve this issue at hand. Probably, things should work by
just allowing hw_breakpoint.c to pass checks for unaligned offset when it is a
WATCHPOINT, no?
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index 26a6bf77d272..c803347c1413 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -384,7 +384,12 @@ int arch_bp_generic_fields(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl,
*gen_len = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8;
@@ -384,7 +384,12 @@ int arch_bp_generic_fields(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl,
*gen_len = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8;
break;
default:
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (ctrl.type == ARM_BREAKPOINT_EXECUTE
+ || ctrl.len & (ctrl.len + 1)
+ || ctrl.len < ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1
+ || ctrl.len > ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ *gen_len = ffs(ctrl.len + 1) - 1;
}
return 0;
@@ -430,7 +435,11 @@ static int arch_build_bp_info(struct perf_event *bp)
info->ctrl.len = ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8;
break;
default:
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (info->ctrl.type == ARM_BREAKPOINT_EXECUTE
+ || bp->attr.bp_len < HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1
+ || bp->attr.bp_len > HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ info->ctrl.len = (1 << bp->attr.bp_len) - 1;
}
/*
@Pavel, does above patch helps to resolve the issue.
~Pratyush
> (2) We might already have users of the perf interface (including compat)
>
> I'm really not happy with the way hw_breakpoint worked out :(
>
> Will
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-07 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-26 16:04 Support for unaligned watchpoints in arm/arm64 Pavel Labath
2016-05-31 12:38 ` Will Deacon
2016-06-07 6:55 ` Pratyush Anand [this message]
2016-06-07 15:17 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-06-08 0:15 ` Pavel Labath
2016-06-08 8:13 ` Pratyush Anand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160607065520.GD13643@dhcppc6 \
--to=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.