From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/intel: output LBR support statement after validation
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 02:08:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160608090854.GD9646@tassilo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBTtgeX_NFS5_6bPx-ZRmYrW+zax5LQ2Wxf6-DQ7kUiRUQ@mail.gmail.com>
> Ok, so you're saying that syscall and int are not causing LBR callstack to
> record an entry. If that is the case, then a rfi should not cause a pop of the
> last LBR entry. Is that right?
rfi = ?
But likely yes. There shouldn't be any ring 0 branches in the callstack LBR,
as long as the patch forcing it to ring 3 is still there.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-08 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-02 2:42 [PATCH 0/3] fix MSR_LAST_BRANCH_FROM Haswell support David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-06-02 2:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/intel: output LBR support statement after validation David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-06-02 8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-02 16:04 ` Andi Kleen
2016-06-02 17:28 ` Stephane Eranian
2016-06-06 1:59 ` Andi Kleen
2016-06-08 7:27 ` Stephane Eranian
2016-06-08 9:08 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2016-06-02 2:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf/x86/intel: fix for MSR_LAST_BRANCH_FROM_x quirk when no TSX David Carrillo-Cisneros
2016-06-02 8:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-02 8:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-02 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <CALcN6mhMsNHgRVuYmYsE+O+Neq6PcaDy1-ARzBd=Vej=0rHr0Q@mail.gmail.com>
2016-06-03 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-02 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-02 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-02 16:07 ` Andi Kleen
2016-06-02 2:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf, perf/tool: trigger lbr_from signext bug David Carrillo-Cisneros
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160608090854.GD9646@tassilo.jf.intel.com \
--to=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davidcc@google.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.