From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
roger.pau@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen-blkfront: don't call talk_to_blkback when already connected to blkback
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:47:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160608144739.GD17027@char.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5757BF4E.9080307@oracle.com>
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 02:46:38PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
>
> On 06/07/2016 11:25 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 01:49:23PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
> >>
> >> On 06/01/2016 04:33 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:59:16PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
> >>>> Sometimes blkfont may receive twice blkback_changed() notification after
> >>>> migration, then talk_to_blkback() will be called twice too and confused
> >>>> xen-blkback.
> >>>
> >>> Could you enlighten the patch description by having some form of
> >>> state transition here? I am curious how you got the frontend
> >>> to get in XenbusStateConnected (via blkif_recover right) and then
> >>> the backend triggering the update once more?
> >>>
> >>> Or is just a simple race - the backend moves from XenbusStateConnected->
> >>> XenbusStateConnected - which retriggers the frontend to hit in
> >>> blkback_changed the XenbusStateConnected state and go in there?
> >>> (That would be in conenct_ring changing the state). But I don't
> >>> see how the frontend_changed code get there as we have:
> >>>
> >>> 770 /*
> >>> 771 * Ensure we connect even when two watches fire in
> >>> 772 * close succession and we miss the intermediate value
> >>> 773 * of frontend_state.
> >>> 774 */
> >>> 775 if (dev->state == XenbusStateConnected)
> >>> 776 break;
> >>> 777
> >>>
> >>> ?
> >>>
> >>> Now what about 'blkfront_connect' being called on the second time?
> >>>
> >>> Ah, info->connected is probably by then in BLKIF_STATE_CONNECTED
> >>> (as blkif_recover changed) and we just reread the size of the disk.
> >>>
> >>> Is that how about the flow goes?
> >>
> >> blkfront blkback
> >> blkfront_resume()
> >> > talk_to_blkback()
> >> > Set blkfront to XenbusStateInitialised
> >> Front changed()
> >> > Connect()
> >> > Set blkback to XenbusStateConnected
> >>
> >> blkback_changed()
> >> > Skip talk_to_blkback()
> >> because frontstate == XenbusStateInitialised
> >> > blkfront_connect()
> >> > Set blkfront to XenbusStateConnected
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> But sometimes blkfront receives
> >> blkback_changed() event more than once!
> >
> > I think I know why. The udev scripts that get invoked when when
> > we attach a disk are a bit custom. As such I think they just
> > revalidate the size leading to this.
> >
> > And this 'poke-at-XenbusStateConnected' state multiple times
> > is allowed. It is used to signal disk changes (or just to revalidate).
> > Hence it does not matter why really - we need to deal with this.
> >
> > I modified your patch a bit and are testing it:
> >
>
> Looks much better, thank you very much!
Great! I also had it tested overnight and there was no hitch will send it
out soon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-08 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-31 8:59 [PATCH 1/2] xen-blkfront: don't call talk_to_blkback when already connected to blkback Bob Liu
2016-05-31 8:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] xen-blkfront: fix resume issues Bob Liu
2016-05-31 8:59 ` Bob Liu
2016-05-31 20:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] xen-blkfront: don't call talk_to_blkback when already connected to blkback Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-05-31 20:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-06-01 5:49 ` Bob Liu
2016-06-02 14:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-06-02 14:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-06-07 15:25 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-06-07 15:25 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-06-08 6:46 ` Bob Liu
2016-06-08 14:47 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2016-06-15 8:39 ` [Xen-devel] " Ross Lagerwall
2016-06-15 14:08 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-06-15 14:08 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-06-15 8:39 ` Ross Lagerwall
2016-06-08 14:47 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-06-08 6:46 ` Bob Liu
2016-06-01 5:49 ` Bob Liu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-05-31 8:59 Bob Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160608144739.GD17027@char.us.oracle.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=bob.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.