From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965176AbcFMLC1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 07:02:27 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:33624 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964790AbcFMLCZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 07:02:25 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:02:21 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: Takashi Iwai , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: 4.7-rc3: Reported regressions from 4.7 Message-ID: <20160613110221.GB18194@pd.tnic> References: <20160613080748.GA19292@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 12:59:26PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > and it could lead to confusion once a regression reporter puts some > crucial information into the tracking bug entry instead of posting it > to the proper place where the developers discuss the problem. Right, this is where a single webpage would help when collecting all the relevant data/links for a regression, regardless of the bugtracker. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.