From: jacob <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powercap/rapl: handle missing msrs
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:53:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160613115310.00bbaf18@jacob-VB> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464727290-5400-2-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Hi Rafael,
Any feedback? It that is OK, can you take this patch independent of the
second patch (which is going into tip tree)?
[PATCH 2/2] powercap/rapl: add support for denverton
This patch affects some Broxton/Apollo Lake where the missing MSR will
cause the driver fail to load.
On Tue, 31 May 2016 13:41:29 -0700
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Some RAPL MSRs may not exist on some CPUs, we need to continue
> the topology detection and enumerate what is available.
>
> This patch handles the missing MSRs then report to powercap
> layer only the features available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c | 103
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 79
> insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c index b0a2dc4..d51a8d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> @@ -329,14 +329,14 @@ static int release_zone(struct powercap_zone
> *power_zone)
> static int find_nr_power_limit(struct rapl_domain *rd)
> {
> - int i;
> + int i, nr_pl = 0;
>
> for (i = 0; i < NR_POWER_LIMITS; i++) {
> - if (rd->rpl[i].name == NULL)
> - break;
> + if (rd->rpl[i].name)
> + nr_pl++;
> }
>
> - return i;
> + return nr_pl;
> }
>
> static int set_domain_enable(struct powercap_zone *power_zone, bool
> mode) @@ -411,15 +411,38 @@ static const struct powercap_zone_ops
> zone_ops[] = { },
> };
>
> -static int set_power_limit(struct powercap_zone *power_zone, int id,
> +
> +/*
> + * Constraint index used by powercap can be different than power
> limit (PL)
> + * index in that some PLs maybe missing due to non-existant MSRs.
> So we
> + * need to convert here by finding the valid PLs only (name
> populated).
> + */
> +static int contraint_to_pl(struct rapl_domain *rd, int cid)
> +{
> + int i, j;
> +
> + for (i = 0, j = 0; i < NR_POWER_LIMITS; i++) {
> + if ((rd->rpl[i].name) && j++ == cid) {
> + pr_debug("%s: index %d\n", __func__, i);
> + return i;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int set_power_limit(struct powercap_zone *power_zone, int cid,
> u64 power_limit)
> {
> struct rapl_domain *rd;
> struct rapl_package *rp;
> int ret = 0;
> + int id;
>
> get_online_cpus();
> rd = power_zone_to_rapl_domain(power_zone);
> + id = contraint_to_pl(rd, cid);
> +
> rp = rd->rp;
>
> if (rd->state & DOMAIN_STATE_BIOS_LOCKED) {
> @@ -446,16 +469,18 @@ set_exit:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int get_current_power_limit(struct powercap_zone *power_zone,
> int id, +static int get_current_power_limit(struct powercap_zone
> *power_zone, int cid, u64 *data)
> {
> struct rapl_domain *rd;
> u64 val;
> int prim;
> int ret = 0;
> + int id;
>
> get_online_cpus();
> rd = power_zone_to_rapl_domain(power_zone);
> + id = contraint_to_pl(rd, cid);
> switch (rd->rpl[id].prim_id) {
> case PL1_ENABLE:
> prim = POWER_LIMIT1;
> @@ -477,14 +502,17 @@ static int get_current_power_limit(struct
> powercap_zone *power_zone, int id, return ret;
> }
>
> -static int set_time_window(struct powercap_zone *power_zone, int id,
> +static int set_time_window(struct powercap_zone *power_zone, int cid,
> u64
> window) {
> struct rapl_domain *rd;
> int ret = 0;
> + int id;
>
> get_online_cpus();
> rd = power_zone_to_rapl_domain(power_zone);
> + id = contraint_to_pl(rd, cid);
> +
> switch (rd->rpl[id].prim_id) {
> case PL1_ENABLE:
> rapl_write_data_raw(rd, TIME_WINDOW1, window);
> @@ -499,14 +527,17 @@ static int set_time_window(struct powercap_zone
> *power_zone, int id, return ret;
> }
>
> -static int get_time_window(struct powercap_zone *power_zone, int id,
> u64 *data) +static int get_time_window(struct powercap_zone
> *power_zone, int cid, u64 *data) {
> struct rapl_domain *rd;
> u64 val;
> int ret = 0;
> + int id;
>
> get_online_cpus();
> rd = power_zone_to_rapl_domain(power_zone);
> + id = contraint_to_pl(rd, cid);
> +
> switch (rd->rpl[id].prim_id) {
> case PL1_ENABLE:
> ret = rapl_read_data_raw(rd, TIME_WINDOW1, true,
> &val); @@ -525,15 +556,17 @@ static int get_time_window(struct
> powercap_zone *power_zone, int id, u64 *data) return ret;
> }
>
> -static const char *get_constraint_name(struct powercap_zone
> *power_zone, int id) +static const char *get_constraint_name(struct
> powercap_zone *power_zone, int cid) {
> - struct rapl_power_limit *rpl;
> struct rapl_domain *rd;
> + int id;
>
> rd = power_zone_to_rapl_domain(power_zone);
> - rpl = (struct rapl_power_limit *) &rd->rpl[id];
> + id = contraint_to_pl(rd, cid);
> + if (id >= 0)
> + return rd->rpl[id].name;
>
> - return rpl->name;
> + return NULL;
> }
>
>
> @@ -1305,6 +1338,37 @@ static int rapl_check_domain(int cpu, int
> domain) return 0;
> }
>
> +
> +/*
> + * Check if power limits are available. Two cases when they are not
> available:
> + * 1. Locked by BIOS, in this case we still provide read-only access
> so that
> + * users can see what limit is set by the BIOS.
> + * 2. Some CPUs make some domains monitoring only which means PLx
> MSRs may not
> + * exist at all. In this case, we do not show the contraints in
> powercap.
> + *
> + * Called after domains are detected and initialized.
> + */
> +static void rapl_detect_powerlimit(struct rapl_domain *rd)
> +{
> + u64 val64;
> + int i;
> +
> + /* check if the domain is locked by BIOS, ignore if MSR
> doesn't exist */
> + if (!rapl_read_data_raw(rd, FW_LOCK, false, &val64)) {
> + if (val64) {
> + pr_info("RAPL package %d domain %s locked by
> BIOS\n",
> + rd->rp->id, rd->name);
> + rd->state |= DOMAIN_STATE_BIOS_LOCKED;
> + }
> + }
> + /* check if power limit MSRs exists, otherwise domain is
> monitoring only */
> + for (i = 0; i < NR_POWER_LIMITS; i++) {
> + int prim = rd->rpl[i].prim_id;
> + if (rapl_read_data_raw(rd, prim, false, &val64))
> + rd->rpl[i].name = NULL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> /* Detect active and valid domains for the given CPU, caller must
> * ensure the CPU belongs to the targeted package and CPU hotlug is
> disabled. */
> @@ -1313,7 +1377,6 @@ static int rapl_detect_domains(struct
> rapl_package *rp, int cpu) int i;
> int ret = 0;
> struct rapl_domain *rd;
> - u64 locked;
>
> for (i = 0; i < RAPL_DOMAIN_MAX; i++) {
> /* use physical package id to read counters */
> @@ -1338,17 +1401,9 @@ static int rapl_detect_domains(struct
> rapl_package *rp, int cpu) }
> rapl_init_domains(rp);
>
> - for (rd = rp->domains; rd < rp->domains + rp->nr_domains;
> rd++) {
> - /* check if the domain is locked by BIOS */
> - ret = rapl_read_data_raw(rd, FW_LOCK, false,
> &locked);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - if (locked) {
> - pr_info("RAPL package %d domain %s locked by
> BIOS\n",
> - rp->id, rd->name);
> - rd->state |= DOMAIN_STATE_BIOS_LOCKED;
> - }
> - }
> + for (rd = rp->domains; rd < rp->domains + rp->nr_domains;
> rd++)
> + rapl_detect_powerlimit(rd);
> +
>
>
> done:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-13 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-31 20:41 [PATCH 0/2] Powercap RAPL update for Denverton Jacob Pan
2016-05-31 20:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] powercap/rapl: handle missing msrs Jacob Pan
2016-06-13 18:53 ` jacob [this message]
2016-06-13 21:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-16 14:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-31 20:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] powercap/rapl: add support for denverton Jacob Pan
2016-05-31 22:19 ` Dave Hansen
2016-06-01 6:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-06-01 15:08 ` Jacob Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160613115310.00bbaf18@jacob-VB \
--to=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.