All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390/topology: add drawer scheduling domain level
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:53:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160613135302.GA30909@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160613151942.02028e15@mschwide>

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:19:42PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:06:47 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 01:22:30PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > Yes, and actually we are all virt/LPAR always, so this is unfortunately not
> > > very easy to do. And yes, I do agree that for the 1:1 case it most likely
> > > would make sense, however we don't have any run-time guarantee to stay 1:1.
> > 
> > One option would be to make it a boot option; such that the
> > administrator has to set it. At that point, if the admin creates
> > multiple LPARs its on him.
> 
> Unfortunately not good enough. The LPAR code tries to optimize the layout
> at the time a partition is activated. The landscape of already running
> partitions can change at this point.

Would not the admin _know_ this? It would be him activating partitions
after all, no?

> To get around this you would have to activate *all* partitions first and
> then start the operating systems in a second step.

Arguably, you only care about the single partition covering the entire
machine case, so I don't see that being a problem.

Again, admin _knows_ this.

> And then there is concurrent repair which will move things around if a
> piece of memory goes bad. This happens rarely though.

That would be magic disturbance indeed, nothing much to do about that.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-13 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-08  9:09 [PATCH 0/2] s390: introduce drawer scheduling domain Heiko Carstens
2016-06-08  9:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] topology/sysfs: provide drawer id and siblings attributes Heiko Carstens
2016-06-08  9:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] s390/topology: add drawer scheduling domain level Heiko Carstens
2016-06-13 11:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-13 11:22     ` Heiko Carstens
2016-06-13 13:06       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-13 13:19         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2016-06-13 13:53           ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-06-13 14:37             ` Martin Schwidefsky
2016-06-13 11:25     ` Heiko Carstens
2016-06-13 11:33       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160613135302.GA30909@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.