All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bsegall@google.com, pjt@google.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	matt@codeblueprint.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] sched/fair: Skip detach sched avgs for new task when changing task groups
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:45:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160614144553.GA7381@worktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160614143649.GC3704@worktop>

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 04:36:49PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 07:15:53AM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> > Newly forked task has not been enqueued, so should not be removed from
> > cfs_rq in task_move_group_fair(). To do so, we identify newly forked
> > tasks by their sched_avg's last_update_time in detach_entity_load_avg().
> 
> >  static void detach_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> >  {
> > +	/* Newly forked tasks are not attached yet. */
> > +	if (!se->avg.last_update_time)
> > +		return;
> 
> Urgh, so this results in two different heuristics to detect 'new' tasks
> and gives two different meanings to !last_update_time.
> 
> How about you use the existing heuristic as per vruntime_normalized()
> and do:
> 
> 	if (!se->sum_exec_runtime)
> 		return;

Hurm,. I see we already have this confusion as per
remove_entity_load_avg(). Could we fix it there too?

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-14 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-08 23:15 [PATCH v5 0/5] sched/fair: Fix attach and detach sched avgs for task group change and sched class change Yuyang Du
2016-06-08 23:15 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] sched/fair: Clean up attach_entity_load_avg() Yuyang Du
2016-06-14 11:11   ` Matt Fleming
2016-06-14 12:11     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-14 22:18     ` Yuyang Du
2016-06-08 23:15 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] sched/fair: Fix attaching task sched avgs twice when switching to fair or changing task group Yuyang Du
2016-06-08 23:15 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] sched/fair: Move load and util avgs from wake_up_new_task() to sched_fork() Yuyang Du
2016-06-08 23:15 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] sched/fair: Skip detach sched avgs for new task when changing task groups Yuyang Du
2016-06-14 11:38   ` Matt Fleming
2016-06-14 14:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-14 14:45     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-06-08 23:15 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] sched/fair: Add inline to detach_entity_load_evg() Yuyang Du

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160614144553.GA7381@worktop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=yuyang.du@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.