All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jdike@addtoit.com, richard@nod.at,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [rcu:rcu/next 25/36] include/linux/irqflags.h:79:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_irqs_disabled_flags'
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:54:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160614225417.GR3923@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201606060200.kVmeQzvA%fengguang.wu@intel.com>

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:04:03AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git rcu/next
> head:   13ee0de9cd2444b57ce30c4f1607b49b90aa0c38
> commit: f251ac814fc5787765009e60d54a2bd4277350c8 [25/36] rcu: Make call_rcu_tasks() tolerate first call with irqs disabled
> config: um-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.1.1-1) 6.1.1 20160430
> reproduce:
>         git checkout f251ac814fc5787765009e60d54a2bd4277350c8
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make ARCH=um 

My kneejerk reaction would be to make CONFIG_TASKS_RCU depend on
!UML or something similar.

Another approach would be create a arch_irqs_disabled_flags() for UML.

Any preferences?

							Thanx, Paul

> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:53:0,
>                     from kernel/rcu/update.c:36:
>    kernel/rcu/update.c: In function 'call_rcu_tasks':
> >> include/linux/irqflags.h:79:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_irqs_disabled_flags' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>       arch_irqs_disabled_flags(flags); \
>       ^
>    include/linux/irqflags.h:149:36: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_irqs_disabled_flags'
>     #define irqs_disabled_flags(flags) raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags)
>                                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    kernel/rcu/update.c:572:21: note: in expansion of macro 'irqs_disabled_flags'
>          (!havetask && !irqs_disabled_flags(flags))) {
>                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 
> vim +/arch_irqs_disabled_flags +79 include/linux/irqflags.h
> 
> df9ee292 David Howells 2010-10-07  73  		typecheck(unsigned long, flags);	\
> df9ee292 David Howells 2010-10-07  74  		flags = arch_local_save_flags();	\
> df9ee292 David Howells 2010-10-07  75  	} while (0)
> df9ee292 David Howells 2010-10-07  76  #define raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags)			\
> df9ee292 David Howells 2010-10-07  77  	({						\
> df9ee292 David Howells 2010-10-07  78  		typecheck(unsigned long, flags);	\
> df9ee292 David Howells 2010-10-07 @79  		arch_irqs_disabled_flags(flags);	\
> df9ee292 David Howells 2010-10-07  80  	})
> df9ee292 David Howells 2010-10-07  81  #define raw_irqs_disabled()		(arch_irqs_disabled())
> df9ee292 David Howells 2010-10-07  82  #define raw_safe_halt()			arch_safe_halt()
> 
> :::::: The code at line 79 was first introduced by commit
> :::::: df9ee29270c11dba7d0fe0b83ce47a4d8e8d2101 Fix IRQ flag handling naming
> 
> :::::: TO: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> :::::: CC: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation




  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-14 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-05 18:04 [rcu:rcu/next 25/36] include/linux/irqflags.h:79:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_irqs_disabled_flags' kbuild test robot
2016-06-14 22:54 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2016-06-15  7:05   ` Richard Weinberger
2016-06-15 12:45     ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-08-08 20:12       ` Richard Weinberger
2016-08-08 20:35         ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-12-14 21:54           ` Richard Weinberger
2016-12-15  0:16             ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160614225417.GR3923@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.