From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
"Brett Rudley" <brudley@broadcom.com>,
"Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>,
"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@broadcom.com>,
"Hante Meuleman" <meuleman@broadcom.com>,
"Pieter-Paul Giesberts" <pieterpg@broadcom.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org (open list:BROADCOM BRCM80211
IEEE802.11n WIRELESS DRIVER),
brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com (open list:BROADCOM BRCM80211
IEEE802.11n WIRELESS DRIVER),
netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: Re: [V2] brcmfmac: fix setting AP channel with new firmwares
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 15:07:33 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160616150733.8C8546141F@smtp.codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464376045-8220-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com>
Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Firmware for new chipsets is based on a new major version of code
> internally maintained at Broadcom. E.g. brcmfmac4366b-pcie.bin (used for
> BCM4366B1) is based on 10.10.69.3309 while brcmfmac43602-pcie.ap.bin was
> based on 7.35.177.56.
>
> Currently setting AP 5 GHz channel doesn't work reliably with BCM4366B1.
> When setting e.g. 36 control channel with VHT80 (center channel 42)
> firmware may randomly pick one of:
> 1) 52 control channel with 58 as center one
> 2) 100 control channel with 106 as center one
> 3) 116 control channel with 122 as center one
> 4) 149 control channel with 155 as center one
>
> It seems new firmwares require setting AP mode (BRCMF_C_SET_AP) before
> specifying a channel. Changing an order of firmware calls fixes the
> problem. This requirement resulted in two separated "chanspec" calls,
> one in AP code path and one in P2P path.
>
> This fix was verified with BCM4366B1 and tested for regressions on
> BCM43602.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Thanks, 1 patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git:
8707e08dbc1f brcmfmac: fix setting AP channel with new firmwares
--
Sent by pwcli
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9138883/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-16 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-24 9:09 [PATCH] brcmfmac: fix setting AP channel with new firmwares Rafał Miłecki
2016-05-25 21:08 ` Arend van Spriel
2016-05-25 21:49 ` Rafał Miłecki
2016-05-27 19:07 ` [PATCH V2] " Rafał Miłecki
2016-06-16 15:07 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160616150733.8C8546141F@smtp.codeaurora.org \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=brudley@broadcom.com \
--cc=frankyl@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meuleman@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pieterpg@broadcom.com \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.