All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>,
	Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	oprofile-list@lists.sf.net, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/oprofile: Remove deprecated create_workqueue
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:08:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160617090821.GB5273@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160614155609.GG3754@osiris>

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 05:56:09PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:28:23PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> > > 
> > >  Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |    2 -
> > >  arch/s390/oprofile/Makefile         |    1 -
> > >  arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.c      | 1178 --------------------------------
> > >  arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.h      |   63 --
> > >  arch/s390/oprofile/init.c           |  489 -------------
> > >  arch/s390/oprofile/op_counter.h     |   21 -
> > >  6 files changed, 1754 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Could you send the patch for review anyway?
> 
> Yes, of course. I added it below, hope that's ok.
> [I did not yet add your Ack]
> 
> From 74ab0aefe07573358cc6a0c462ddc62ccba4c0cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:40:06 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] s390/oprofile: remove hardware sampler support
> 
> Remove hardware sampler support from oprofile module.
> 
> The oprofile user space utilty has been switched to use the kernel
> perf interface, for which we also provide hardware sampling support.
> 
> In addition the hardware sampling support is also slightly broken: it
> supports only 16 bits for the pid and therefore would generate wrong
> results on machines which have a pid >64k.
> 
> Also the pt_regs structure which was passed to oprofile common code
> cannot necessarily be used to generate sane backtraces, since the
> task(s) in question may run while the samples are fed to oprofile.
> So the result would be more or less random.
> 
> However given that the only user space tools switched to the perf
> interface already four years ago the hardware sampler code seems to be
> unused code, and therefore it should be reasonable to remove it.
> 
> The timer based oprofile support continues to work.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |    2 -
>  arch/s390/oprofile/Makefile         |    1 -
>  arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.c      | 1178 -----------------------------------
>  arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.h      |   63 --
>  arch/s390/oprofile/init.c           |  489 ---------------
>  arch/s390/oprofile/op_counter.h     |   21 -
>  6 files changed, 1754 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.c
>  delete mode 100644 arch/s390/oprofile/hwsampler.h
>  delete mode 100644 arch/s390/oprofile/op_counter.h
> 

Reviewed-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

      reply	other threads:[~2016-06-17  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-07 21:59 [PATCH] s390/oprofile: Remove deprecated create_workqueue Bhaktipriya Shridhar
2016-06-07 23:29 ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-09  9:00 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-06-13 16:29   ` Robert Richter
2016-06-13 20:44     ` William Cohen
2016-06-14  5:36     ` Heiko Carstens
2016-06-14 13:28       ` Robert Richter
2016-06-14 15:56         ` Heiko Carstens
2016-06-14 15:56           ` Heiko Carstens
2016-06-17  9:08           ` Hendrik Brueckner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160617090821.GB5273@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bhaktipriya96@gmail.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oprofile-list@lists.sf.net \
    --cc=rric@kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.