From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] gpio: Allow PC/104 devices on X86_64 Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 19:36:07 -0700 Message-ID: <20160618023607.GA7390@kroah.com> References: <61880bededb77bbc3ea3422e48ce717d2a2ff489.1464380034.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> <20160531112251.GA5674@sophia> <20160531152541.GB13304@kroah.com> <057d8c0b-074c-609a-35da-5a01f07b6d31@leemhuis.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <057d8c0b-074c-609a-35da-5a01f07b6d31-rCxcAJFjeRkk+I/owrrOrA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-iio-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: William Breathitt Gray , Linus Walleij , Andrew Morton , x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, "linux-next-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , linux-watchdog-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Stephen Rothwell , Guenter Roeck , Alexandre Courbot List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:47:14PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 31.05.2016 17:25, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:23:06AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wr= ote: > >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:41:49AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > >>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:08 AM, William Breathitt Gray > >>> wrote: > >>>> With the introduction of the ISA_BUS_API Kconfig option, ISA-sty= le > >>>> drivers may be built for X86_64 architectures. This patch change= s the > >>>> ISA Kconfig option dependency of the PC/104 drivers to ISA_BUS_A= PI, thus > >>>> allowing them to build for X86_64 as they are expected to. > > [=E2=80=A6] > >> Greg K-H, > >> > >> Would you be able to pick up this entire patchset via driver-core;= I > >> figure that tree is the most appropriate to receive any core ISA b= us > >> driver changes (unless you see a more fitting path to take). > > [=E2=80=A6] > > Yes, I can take this through the driver core tree as that's where t= he > > original series came from... >=20 > Was this series merged or did it fell through the cracks? I currently > assume the latter, as I can't see it in neither mainline nor linux-ne= xt > (but maybe I'm missing something). Just wondering, because I have thi= s > issue on my regression list for 4.7. >=20 > For the whole context see: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.gpio/17016/ >=20 > Sincerely, your regression tracker for Linux 4.7 (http://bit.ly/28JRm= Jo) I don't think this is a regression, I was going to queue these up for 4.8-rc1. As it is now, 4.7-rc is working just fine in this regards, right? Or am I missing something? thanks, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33485 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751300AbcFRCgI (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jun 2016 22:36:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 19:36:07 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: William Breathitt Gray , Linus Walleij , Andrew Morton , x86@kernel.org, "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell , Guenter Roeck , Alexandre Courbot Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] gpio: Allow PC/104 devices on X86_64 Message-ID: <20160618023607.GA7390@kroah.com> References: <61880bededb77bbc3ea3422e48ce717d2a2ff489.1464380034.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> <20160531112251.GA5674@sophia> <20160531152541.GB13304@kroah.com> <057d8c0b-074c-609a-35da-5a01f07b6d31@leemhuis.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <057d8c0b-074c-609a-35da-5a01f07b6d31@leemhuis.info> Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:47:14PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 31.05.2016 17:25, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:23:06AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:41:49AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > >>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:08 AM, William Breathitt Gray > >>> wrote: > >>>> With the introduction of the ISA_BUS_API Kconfig option, ISA-style > >>>> drivers may be built for X86_64 architectures. This patch changes the > >>>> ISA Kconfig option dependency of the PC/104 drivers to ISA_BUS_API, thus > >>>> allowing them to build for X86_64 as they are expected to. > > […] > >> Greg K-H, > >> > >> Would you be able to pick up this entire patchset via driver-core; I > >> figure that tree is the most appropriate to receive any core ISA bus > >> driver changes (unless you see a more fitting path to take). > > […] > > Yes, I can take this through the driver core tree as that's where the > > original series came from... > > Was this series merged or did it fell through the cracks? I currently > assume the latter, as I can't see it in neither mainline nor linux-next > (but maybe I'm missing something). Just wondering, because I have this > issue on my regression list for 4.7. > > For the whole context see: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.gpio/17016/ > > Sincerely, your regression tracker for Linux 4.7 (http://bit.ly/28JRmJo) I don't think this is a regression, I was going to queue these up for 4.8-rc1. As it is now, 4.7-rc is working just fine in this regards, right? Or am I missing something? thanks, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33485 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751300AbcFRCgI (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jun 2016 22:36:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 19:36:07 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: William Breathitt Gray , Linus Walleij , Andrew Morton , x86@kernel.org, "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell , Guenter Roeck , Alexandre Courbot Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] gpio: Allow PC/104 devices on X86_64 Message-ID: <20160618023607.GA7390@kroah.com> References: <61880bededb77bbc3ea3422e48ce717d2a2ff489.1464380034.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> <20160531112251.GA5674@sophia> <20160531152541.GB13304@kroah.com> <057d8c0b-074c-609a-35da-5a01f07b6d31@leemhuis.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <057d8c0b-074c-609a-35da-5a01f07b6d31@leemhuis.info> Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:47:14PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 31.05.2016 17:25, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:23:06AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrot= e: > >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:41:49AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > >>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:08 AM, William Breathitt Gray > >>> wrote: > >>>> With the introduction of the ISA_BUS_API Kconfig option, ISA-style > >>>> drivers may be built for X86_64 architectures. This patch changes = the > >>>> ISA Kconfig option dependency of the PC/104 drivers to ISA_BUS_API= , thus > >>>> allowing them to build for X86_64 as they are expected to. > > [=E2=80=A6] > >> Greg K-H, > >> > >> Would you be able to pick up this entire patchset via driver-core; I > >> figure that tree is the most appropriate to receive any core ISA bus > >> driver changes (unless you see a more fitting path to take). > > [=E2=80=A6] > > Yes, I can take this through the driver core tree as that's where the > > original series came from... >=20 > Was this series merged or did it fell through the cracks? I currently > assume the latter, as I can't see it in neither mainline nor linux-next > (but maybe I'm missing something). Just wondering, because I have this > issue on my regression list for 4.7. >=20 > For the whole context see: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.gpio/17016/ >=20 > Sincerely, your regression tracker for Linux 4.7 (http://bit.ly/28JRmJo= ) I don't think this is a regression, I was going to queue these up for 4.8-rc1. As it is now, 4.7-rc is working just fine in this regards, right? Or am I missing something? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog"= in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html