All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ptrace: Remove questionable TS_COMPAT usage in ptrace
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 23:19:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160619211906.GA14712@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94bda8cd5f326ae5591c80fb5d7c1c22624accec.1466244711.git.luto@kernel.org>

Let me first thank Pedro who has already replied!

And I have to admit I will need to re-read his explanations after
sleep to (try to) convince myself I fully understans the problems ;)
Too late for me.

Right now I have nothing to add, but

On 06/18, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> @@ -922,16 +922,7 @@ static int putreg32(struct task_struct *child, unsigned regno, u32 value)
>  	R32(esp, sp);
>  
>  	case offsetof(struct user32, regs.orig_eax):
> -		/*
> -		 * A 32-bit debugger setting orig_eax means to restore
> -		 * the state of the task restarting a 32-bit syscall.
> -		 * Make sure we interpret the -ERESTART* codes correctly
> -		 * in case the task is not actually still sitting at the
> -		 * exit from a 32-bit syscall with TS_COMPAT still set.
> -		 */
>  		regs->orig_ax = value;
> -		if (syscall_get_nr(child, regs) >= 0)
> -			task_thread_info(child)->status |= TS_COMPAT;

I agree it would be nice to remove this code, but then it is not clear
how/when we should sign-extend regs->ax..

And this leads to another question, why do we actually need to set/clear
TS_COMPAT in set_personality_ia32() ??

Oleg.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-19 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-18 10:21 [PATCH] x86/ptrace: Remove questionable TS_COMPAT usage in ptrace Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-18 13:55 ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-18 14:41   ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-18 17:02   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-19 22:09     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-20 10:27       ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-20 15:24       ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-20 16:30         ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-20 16:14           ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-20 17:25             ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-20 10:07     ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-20 11:12       ` Jan Kratochvil
2016-06-18 17:48 ` Kees Cook
2016-06-19 21:19 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2016-06-19 22:23   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-20  6:12   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-20 15:31     ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-20 17:53     ` the usage of __SYSCALL_MASK in entry_SYSCALL_64/do_syscall_64 is not consistent Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-21 19:01       ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160619211906.GA14712@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.