From: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mbuf: remove inconsistent assert statements
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 15:49:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160620134936.GV7621@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836B6CE18@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:34:17AM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> Hi Adrien,
>
> >
> > An assertion failure occurs in __rte_mbuf_raw_free() (called by a few PMDs)
> > when compiling DPDK with CONFIG_RTE_LOG_LEVEL=RTE_LOG_DEBUG and starting
> > applications with a log level high enough to trigger it.
> >
> > While rte_mbuf_raw_alloc() sets refcount to 1, __rte_mbuf_raw_free()
> > expects it to be 0.
> >Considering users are not expected to reset the
> > reference count to satisfy assert() and that raw functions are designed on
> > purpose without safety belts, remove these checks.
>
> Yes, it refcnt supposed to be set to 0 by __rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg().
> Wright now, it is a user responsibility to make sure refcnt==0 before pushing
> mbuf back to the pool.
> Not sure why do you consider that wrong?
> If the user calls __rte_mbuf_raw_free() manualy it is his responsibility to make
> sure mbuf's refcn==0.
> BTW, why are you doing it?
> The comment clearly states that the function is for internal use:
> /**
> * @internal Put mbuf back into its original mempool.
> * The use of that function is reserved for RTE internal needs.
> * Please use rte_pktmbuf_free().
> *
> * @param m
> * The mbuf to be freed.
> */
> static inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
> __rte_mbuf_raw_free(struct rte_mbuf *m)
Bottom line is that I'm dropping this patch for now. We'll update our last
mlx5 patchset to do it properly and keep these assert in place.
Thanks.
--
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-20 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-08 8:31 [PATCH] mbuf: remove inconsistent assert statements Adrien Mazarguil
2016-06-08 10:34 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-08 12:27 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-06-08 13:09 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-08 13:57 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-06-08 14:11 ` Olivier Matz
2016-06-08 16:07 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-09 7:46 ` Olivier Matz
2016-06-09 13:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-09 14:19 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-06-09 15:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-06-09 15:45 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-09 18:42 ` Don Provan
2016-06-20 13:49 ` Adrien Mazarguil [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160620134936.GV7621@6wind.com \
--to=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.