All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 1/6] tests/kms_flip: Print timestamps in a consistent form
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:01:12 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160622130112.GC4329@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160622123416.GB22318@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:34:16PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:25:27PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Would it be possible for writing timing requirement tests for individual
> updates of planes on the same CRTC? E.g. making sure that legacy cursor
> doesn't block pageflips and vice versa. Also extending that to
> independent updates of primary vs sprite planes?

I guess all that should be doable.

I was also thinking we should at least have some kind of basic
performance benchmark for atomic ioctls. Eg. do TEST_ONLY ioctls
with different sets of properties and make sure we don't totally
suck.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-22 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-21 17:25 [PATCH i-g-t 1/6] tests/kms_flip: Print timestamps in a consistent form ville.syrjala
2016-06-21 17:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/6] tests/kms_flip: Constify some function arguments ville.syrjala
2016-06-21 17:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t 3/6] tests/kms_flip: Use USEC_PER_SEC ville.syrjala
2016-06-21 17:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t 4/6] tests/kms_flip: Account for diff.tv_secs in jitter check ville.syrjala
2016-06-21 17:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t 5/6] tests/kms_flip: Print the expected diff between two events ville.syrjala
2016-06-21 17:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t 6/6] tests/kms_flip: Check that the last vs. current seq/ts are consistent ville.syrjala
2016-06-22 12:34 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/6] tests/kms_flip: Print timestamps in a consistent form Chris Wilson
2016-06-22 13:01   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2016-06-22 13:11     ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-22 13:26       ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-06-22 20:33         ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-23 12:13           ` Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160622130112.GC4329@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.