From: "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki" <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: PCI passthrough for HVM with stubdomain broken by "tools/libxl: handle the iomem parameter with the memory_mapping hcall"
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:49:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160623154924.GM1593@mail-itl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160623154522.GL1593@mail-itl>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1767 bytes --]
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 05:45:22PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:37:09AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 23.06.16 at 17:22, <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com> wrote:
> > > xen: allow XEN_DOMCTL_getdomaininfo for device model domains
> > >
> > > Allow device model domain to get info about its target domain.
> > > It is used during PCI passthrough setup (xc_domain_memory_mapping
> > > checks for guest being auto-translated). While it happens in stubdomain,
> > > it failed, breaking PCI passthrough in such setup.
> >
> > If that's the route to go (which I'm not convinced of, as I'm not sure
> > we won't need other xenstore domain special casing later on) I'd
> > really like to ask you to mention the other broken case too, as
> > described in my original patch (unless you found I was wrong with
> > that).
>
> So, maybe something like this:
> case XEN_DOMCTL_getdomaininfo:
> if ( current-domain->is_xenstore )
> return xsm_default_action(XSM_XS_PRIV, current->domain, d);;
> return xsm_default_action(XSM_DM_PRIV, current->domain, d);
>
>
> In your patch (changing XSM_XS_PRIV semantic), you implicitly considered
> all domctls allowed for xenstore domain to be always a subset of those
> allowed for device model domain. For now this is true, but if this set
> is going to be extended in the future, your approach most likely will
> lead to an error.
Hmm, but if xenstore domain will never be also device model domain, this
probably change nothing...
--
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-23 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-22 13:03 PCI passthrough for HVM with stubdomain broken by "tools/libxl: handle the iomem parameter with the memory_mapping hcall" Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2016-06-22 13:50 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-22 14:13 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2016-06-22 15:23 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-22 18:24 ` Daniel De Graaf
2016-06-23 8:32 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-23 8:39 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-23 14:33 ` Daniel De Graaf
2016-06-23 8:57 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2016-06-23 9:12 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-23 9:18 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2016-06-23 9:23 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2016-06-23 9:46 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-23 13:25 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2016-06-23 14:12 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-06-23 14:59 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2016-06-23 15:01 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-06-23 14:45 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-23 15:00 ` Daniel De Graaf
2016-06-23 15:22 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2016-06-23 15:30 ` Daniel De Graaf
2016-06-23 15:37 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-23 15:45 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2016-06-23 15:49 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki [this message]
2016-06-23 16:02 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-23 9:45 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-23 9:44 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-06-23 9:50 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-23 14:15 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160623154924.GM1593@mail-itl \
--to=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.