All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: Re: Is LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() still needed?
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:07:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160624210753.GA13997@two.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB=NE6W6Eh1tU=NXf20f-CPYeT22mtXGzrYqM9W-f14dGBrEsA@mail.gmail.com>

> But nothing quite obviously setting these upstream. I'm probably just
> missing something obvious though. Either way I figured now would be a
> good time to ask as I have other code that would use this, the linker
> table stuff I've been working. If we can avoid propagating more use of
> LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() then great. If we still need it its probably
> good to document this a bit more as can't see anything super clear.

It was a work around for a gcc 4.7 LTO problem. I guess it could be
dropped by now.

Yes I've been slow in submitting the LTO patches, even though they
have a quite active out of tree user base. Will try to do better.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-24 21:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-23 23:34 Is LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() still needed? Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-06-24 21:07 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2016-06-28  0:47   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-07-07  0:22     ` [PATCH] x86: remove LTO flags Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-07-07  1:55       ` Andi Kleen
2016-07-07 16:01         ` [PATCH v2] x86: remove LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-07-07 16:32           ` Andi Kleen
2016-07-21 19:00             ` Luis R. Rodriguez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160624210753.GA13997@two.firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.