All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	dave@stgolabs.net, will.deacon@arm.com, Waiman.Long@hpe.com,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq lock
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 23:21:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160625152130.GA2452@insomnia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160625142447.GK30154@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1941 bytes --]

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 04:24:47PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 01:42:03PM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> > An over-committed guest with more vCPUs than pCPUs has a heavy overload
> > in osq_lock().
> > 
> > This is because vCPU A hold the osq lock and yield out, vCPU B wait
> > per_cpu node->locked to be set. IOW, vCPU B wait vCPU A to run and
> > unlock the osq lock. Even there is need_resched(), it did not help on
> > such scenario.
> > 
> > To fix such bad issue, add a threshold in one while-loop of osq_lock().
> > The value of threshold is somehow equal to SPIN_THRESHOLD.
> 
> Blergh, virt ...
> 
> So yes, lock holder preemption sucks. You would also want to limit the
> immediate spin on owner.
> 
> Also; I really hate these random number spin-loop thresholds.
> 
> Is it at all possible to get feedback from your LPAR stuff that the vcpu
> was preempted? Because at that point we can add do something like:
> 

Good point!

> 
> 	int vpc = vcpu_preempt_count();
> 
> 	...
> 
> 	for (;;) {
> 
> 		/* the big spin loop */
> 
> 		if (need_resched() || vpc != vcpu_preempt_count())

So on PPC, we have lppaca::yield_count to detect when an vcpu is
preempted, if the yield_count is even, the vcpu is running, otherwise it
is preempted(__spin_yield() is a user of this).

Therefore it makes more sense we

		if (need_resched() || vcpu_is_preempted(old))

here, and implement vcpu_is_preempted() on PPC as

bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
{
	return !!(be32_to_cpu(lppaca_of(cpu).yield_count) & 1)
}

Thoughts?

Regards,
Boqun

> 			/* bail */
> 
> 	}
> 
> 
> With a default implementation like:
> 
> static inline int vcpu_preempt_count(void)
> {
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> So the compiler can make it all go away.
> 
> 
> But on virt muck it would stop spinning the moment the vcpu gets
> preempted, which is the right moment I'm thinking.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-25 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-25 17:42 [PATCH] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq lock Pan Xinhui
2016-06-25 14:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-25 15:21   ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2016-06-25 16:09     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-25 16:13       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-25 17:27         ` panxinhui
2016-06-25 19:12           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-26  4:59             ` panxinhui
2016-06-27  7:55               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-27 10:19                 ` xinhui
2016-06-25 16:28       ` Boqun Feng
2016-06-25 18:28         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-25 16:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-25 16:45       ` Boqun Feng
2016-06-25 17:27         ` panxinhui
2016-06-25 19:20           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-25 19:29             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-26  2:26             ` Boqun Feng
2016-06-26  5:21             ` panxinhui
2016-06-26  6:10               ` Boqun Feng
2016-06-26  6:58                 ` panxinhui
2016-06-26 14:11                   ` Boqun Feng
2016-06-26 15:54                     ` panxinhui
2016-06-26  6:59                 ` Boqun Feng
2016-06-26  7:08                   ` panxinhui
2016-06-26 14:29                     ` Boqun Feng
2016-06-26 15:11                       ` panxinhui
2016-06-27  6:45                   ` Boqun Feng
2016-06-27  7:36                     ` xinhui
2016-06-27  8:09                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-27 10:31                       ` Boqun Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160625152130.GA2452@insomnia \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.