From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: don't call xfs_sb_quota_from_disk twice
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:48:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160627094855.GC29774@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13dd3974-956d-c3af-86ed-f6ce5cc1b996@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 04:24:58PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> kernel commit 5ef828c4
> xfs: avoid false quotacheck after unclean shutdown
>
> made xfs_sb_from_disk() also call xfs_sb_quota_from_disk
> by default.
>
> However, when this was merged to libxfs, existing separate
> calls to libxfs_sb_quota_from_disk remained, and calling it
> twice in a row on a V4 superblock leads to issues, because:
>
>
> if (sbp->sb_qflags & XFS_PQUOTA_ACCT) {
> ...
> sbp->sb_pquotino = sbp->sb_gquotino;
> sbp->sb_gquotino = NULLFSINO;
>
> and after the second call, we have set both pquotino and gquotino
> to NULLFSINO.
>
> Fix this by making it safe to call twice, and also remove the extra
> calls to libxfs_sb_quota_from_disk.
>
> This is only spotted when running xfstests with "-m crc=0" because
> the sb_from_disk change came about after V5 became default, and
> the above behavior only exists on a V4 superblock.
>
> Reported-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
>
>
> diff --git a/libxfs/xfs_sb.c b/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> index 45db6ae..44f3e3e 100644
> --- a/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> +++ b/libxfs/xfs_sb.c
> @@ -316,13 +316,16 @@ xfs_sb_quota_from_disk(struct xfs_sb *sbp)
> XFS_PQUOTA_CHKD : XFS_GQUOTA_CHKD;
> sbp->sb_qflags &= ~(XFS_OQUOTA_ENFD | XFS_OQUOTA_CHKD);
>
> - if (sbp->sb_qflags & XFS_PQUOTA_ACCT) {
> + if (sbp->sb_qflags & XFS_PQUOTA_ACCT &&
> + sbp->sb_gquotino != NULLFSINO) {
Although I agree with this check, shouldn't we report some sort of error when it
happens? Once, it's not supposed to happen, and, might be a sign of corruption?
Cheers
> /*
> * In older version of superblock, on-disk superblock only
> * has sb_gquotino, and in-core superblock has both sb_gquotino
> * and sb_pquotino. But, only one of them is supported at any
> * point of time. So, if PQUOTA is set in disk superblock,
> - * copy over sb_gquotino to sb_pquotino.
> + * copy over sb_gquotino to sb_pquotino. The NULLFSINO test
> + * above is to make sure we don't do this twice and wipe them
> + * both out!
> */
> sbp->sb_pquotino = sbp->sb_gquotino;
> sbp->sb_gquotino = NULLFSINO;
> diff --git a/repair/sb.c b/repair/sb.c
> index 3965953..8087242 100644
> --- a/repair/sb.c
> +++ b/repair/sb.c
> @@ -155,7 +155,6 @@ __find_secondary_sb(
> for (i = 0; !done && i < bsize; i += BBSIZE) {
> c_bufsb = (char *)sb + i;
> libxfs_sb_from_disk(&bufsb, (xfs_dsb_t *)c_bufsb);
> - libxfs_sb_quota_from_disk(&bufsb);
>
> if (verify_sb(c_bufsb, &bufsb, 0) != XR_OK)
> continue;
> @@ -568,7 +567,6 @@ get_sb(xfs_sb_t *sbp, xfs_off_t off, int size, xfs_agnumber_t agno)
> do_error("%s\n", strerror(error));
> }
> libxfs_sb_from_disk(sbp, buf);
> - libxfs_sb_quota_from_disk(sbp);
>
> rval = verify_sb((char *)buf, sbp, agno == 0);
> free(buf);
> diff --git a/repair/scan.c b/repair/scan.c
> index 964ff06..366ce16 100644
> --- a/repair/scan.c
> +++ b/repair/scan.c
> @@ -1622,7 +1622,6 @@ scan_ag(
> goto out_free_sb;
> }
> libxfs_sb_from_disk(sb, XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(sbbuf));
> - libxfs_sb_quota_from_disk(sb);
>
> agfbuf = libxfs_readbuf(mp->m_dev,
> XFS_AG_DADDR(mp, agno, XFS_AGF_DADDR(mp)),
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
--
Carlos
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-27 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-24 21:24 [PATCH] xfs_repair: don't call xfs_sb_quota_from_disk twice Eric Sandeen
2016-06-27 9:48 ` Carlos Maiolino [this message]
2016-06-27 15:34 ` Eric Sandeen
2016-06-28 8:57 ` Carlos Maiolino
2016-06-28 15:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2016-06-29 8:30 ` Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160627094855.GC29774@redhat.com \
--to=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.