From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / runtime: Asynchronous "idle" in pm_runtime_allow()
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 17:00:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160629150044.GA1900@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1606291002030.1917-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 10:02:42AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >
> > Arjan reports that it takes a relatively long time to enable runtime
> > PM for multiple devices at system startup, because all writes to the
> > "control" attribute in sysfs are handled synchronously and if the
> > device is suspended as a result of the write, it will block until
> > that operation is complete.
> >
> > That may be avoided by passing the RPM_ASYNC flag to rpm_idle()
> > in pm_runtime_allow() which will make it execute the device's
> > "idle" callback asynchronously, so writes to "control" changing
> > it from "on" to "auto" will return without waiting.
Looks like pm_runtime_allow() can now be added to the section "It is
safe to execute the following helper functions from interrupt context"
in Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt.
Best regards,
Lukas
> >
> > Reported-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> > @@ -1256,7 +1256,7 @@ void pm_runtime_allow(struct device *dev
> >
> > dev->power.runtime_auto = true;
> > if (atomic_dec_and_test(&dev->power.usage_count))
> > - rpm_idle(dev, RPM_AUTO);
> > + rpm_idle(dev, RPM_AUTO | RPM_ASYNC);
> >
> > out:
> > spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
>
> Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-29 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-29 0:53 [PATCH] PM / runtime: Asynchronous "idle" in pm_runtime_allow() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-29 14:02 ` Alan Stern
2016-06-29 15:00 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2016-06-29 16:48 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-06-30 22:48 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160629150044.GA1900@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.