From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: sti: fix prototypes after API change Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 15:38:10 +0200 Message-ID: <20160704133810.GF6247@sirena.org.uk> References: <20160704131651.1083630-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20160704132230.GD6247@sirena.org.uk> <6436978.7TJhubtDTK@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="11IAkegDWp8TRrA/" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6436978.7TJhubtDTK@wuerfel> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: David Airlie , Arnaud Pouliquen , kernel@stlinux.com, Kuninori Morimoto , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org --11IAkegDWp8TRrA/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 03:36:57PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday, July 4, 2016 3:22:30 PM CEST Mark Brown wrote: > > I sent a pull request for the API change to the DRM people which might > > be easier given that it's a single commit topic branch rather than the > > whole of DRM. > Agreed, that is probably the best way forward. Does your pull request > also contain an equivalent of my two patches? No, I just sent a pull request for the API change - I don't have the new patches in my tree. --11IAkegDWp8TRrA/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXembBAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQrJMH/iCzkrn0UMtLOAuD2/uqNCOR B2WGzbFO1RU5uO2RwJtU/fbsB1WX8We2idms1jxhe4BpjEY0HNjCzJ5MuAA/FvqD XwxOLnhcRQC26jHQeH36Mjcy2wStkTdQ00i0StOjrNSjQ97isQ+wvWcGnBCdccUX G8IIvvItslkznFXtDp4Jvhp2dSHqlAO8vwz0K8rplhQuiV+RBd+4upeFDegtwJOy poWr2zRaYx2mUY4RyQmU/DEvzAlCWp4+RLfm2Tb++mBElLNoXuCrImARYQPTDI39 8vUSZXb57ZtqkqId2N7AuL5MYqd4CpRSGykczFxpQGTpFnSG1p7nVn1jpTGuruU= =GGEG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --11IAkegDWp8TRrA/--