From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51540)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1bKMMH-0003Iz-Kh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 05:09:34 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1bKMMF-000313-GB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 05:09:32 -0400
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 17:09:23 +0800
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20160705090923.GF29307@ad.usersys.redhat.com>
References: <1467652201-51688-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1467652201-51688-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.7? 0/3] Two coroutine tweaks
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org

On Mon, 07/04 19:09, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I meant to send these close to soft freeze because the final patch is
> prone to conflicts, but it turns out I didn't send them.  Still they're
> pretty mechanical so I'm shooting them out now.  Any thoughts?

I didn't review patch 3 line by line trusting coccinelle and the compiler,
otherwise the series looks good to me and the parameter moving is particularly
nice! Thanks,

Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>