All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@dell.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v5] i2c: i801: Allow ACPI SystemIO OpRegion to conflict with PCI BAR
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 14:51:42 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160705115142.GO23527@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201607051330.23650@pali>

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 01:30:23PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 July 2016 12:14:55 Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > The whole point of this patch is that we expect that nobody never
> > uses that OpRegion. I'm 99% sure you don't find a single machine
> > where it is actually in use.
> 
> HP EliteBook 8460p uses it for sure! Here are DSDT snips:
> 
> 
>                 Method (\_SB.PCI0.LPCB.SMAB, 3, Serialized)
>                 {
>                     If (LEqual (And (Arg0, 0x01), 0x00))
>                     {
>                         Store (0x01, Local0)
>                         Store (\_SB.PCI0.SBUS.SWRB (Arg0, Arg1, Arg2), Local1)
>                         If (Local1)
>                         {
>                             Store (0x00, Local0)
>                         }
>                     }
>                     Else
>                     {
>                         Store (\_SB.PCI0.SBUS.SRDB (Arg0, Arg1), Local0)
>                     }
> 
>                     Return (Local0)
>                 }
> 

Crap, well that is in that 1% then ;-)

> ...
> 
>                 Method (ALRD, 1, Serialized)
>                 {
>                     Store (\_SB.PCI0.LPCB.SMAB (0x33, Arg0, 0x00), Local0)
>                     Return (Local0)
>                 }
> 
>                 Method (ALWR, 2, Serialized)
>                 {
>                     Store (\_SB.PCI0.LPCB.SMAB (0x32, Arg0, Arg1), Local0)
>                     Return (Local0)
>                 }
> 
> 
> And ALRD and ALWR methods are used by hp_accel.ko kernel driver.

So are you able to test what happens when you unload the driver? I think
the safest thing to do is that we just pin the driver in the kernel once
we notice the OpRegion is being accessed. Does anyone else have better
ideas?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-05 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-23  8:04 [PATCH v5] i2c: i801: Allow ACPI SystemIO OpRegion to conflict with PCI BAR Mika Westerberg
2016-06-08 16:29 ` [v5] " Benjamin Tissoires
2016-06-09  8:15   ` Mika Westerberg
2016-06-13  9:19   ` Jean Delvare
2016-06-13  9:45     ` Pali Rohár
2016-06-13  9:46       ` Mika Westerberg
2016-06-13  9:48         ` Pali Rohár
2016-06-13  9:54           ` Mika Westerberg
2016-06-24 14:12             ` Jean Delvare
2016-06-29  7:56               ` Pali Rohár
2016-06-29 10:39               ` Mika Westerberg
2016-07-04  8:22                 ` Jean Delvare
2016-07-04 14:30                   ` Pali Rohár
2016-07-05 10:14                   ` Mika Westerberg
2016-07-05 11:30                     ` Pali Rohár
2016-07-05 11:51                       ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2016-07-05 11:56                         ` Pali Rohár
2016-07-05 12:00                           ` Pali Rohár
2016-07-05 14:31                             ` Mika Westerberg
2016-07-24 10:08                               ` Martin Vajnar
2016-07-25 10:19                                 ` Pali Rohár
2016-07-14 11:52                             ` Pali Rohár
2016-07-14 14:20                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-25 10:22                   ` Pali Rohár

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160705115142.GO23527@lahna.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mario_limonciello@dell.com \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.