From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: dsa: Suffix function manipulating device_node with _dn Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 00:36:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20160705223612.GC28825@lunn.ch> References: <1467756433-25062-1-git-send-email-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <1467756433-25062-4-git-send-email-f.fainelli@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com To: Florian Fainelli Return-path: Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:36514 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751052AbcGEWgP (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:36:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1467756433-25062-4-git-send-email-f.fainelli@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 03:07:12PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Make it clear that these functions take a device_node structure pointer Hi Florian Didn't we agree that we would only support a single device via a C coded platform data structure? All the functions you are renaming will never be called in that case. So i think they can retain there names. You have no need to add none device node equivalents. So lets drop this patch. Andrew