From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Sakkinen Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-tpmfront: correct return value check on xenbus_scanf() Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:21:35 +0300 Message-ID: <20160707122135.GA17711@intel.com> References: <577E291002000078000FBF18@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <20160707103554.GA13244@intel.com> <20160707103859.GA13815@intel.com> <577E607902000078000FC2FA@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <577E607902000078000FC2FA@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: david.vrabel@citrix.com, peterhuewe@gmx.de, "tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, tpmdd@selhorst.net, Juergen Gross , stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 06:00:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 07.07.16 at 12:38, wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:35:54PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 02:04:00AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> > Only a positive return value indicates success. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen > > > > Applied. Should this be CC'd to stable or not? > > Actually the Xen code maintainers dislike this kind of change > (expressed in reply to a change elsewhere in the tree), so > maybe you want to sync with them whether to pull it back out. > In any event I don't think it needs Cc-ing to stable@. OK, it's in my master branch (bleeding edge) so no harm done yet. > Jan /Jarkko