All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sivaram Nair <sivaramn@nvidia.com>
To: Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>,
	Matthew Longnecker <MLongnecker@nvidia.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 02/10] mailbox: tegra-hsp: Add HSP(Hardware Synchronization Primitives) driver
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 14:10:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160707211016.GA9897@kickseed.nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160705090431.5852-3-josephl@nvidia.com>

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 05:04:23PM +0800, Joseph Lo wrote:
> The Tegra HSP mailbox driver implements the signaling doorbell-based
> interprocessor communication (IPC) for remote processors currently. The
> HSP HW modules support some different features for that, which are
> shared mailboxes, shared semaphores, arbitrated semaphores, and
> doorbells. And there are multiple HSP HW instances on the chip. So the
> driver is extendable to support more features for different IPC
> requirement.
> 
> The driver of remote processor can use it as a mailbox client and deal
> with the IPC protocol to synchronize the data communications.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com>
> ---
> Changes in V2:
> - Update the driver to support the binding changes in V2
> - it's extendable to support multiple HSP sub-modules on the same HSP HW block
>   now.
> ---
>  drivers/mailbox/Kconfig     |   9 +
>  drivers/mailbox/Makefile    |   2 +
>  drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c | 418 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 429 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> index 5305923752d2..fe584cb54720 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> @@ -114,6 +114,15 @@ config MAILBOX_TEST
>  	  Test client to help with testing new Controller driver
>  	  implementations.
>  
> +config TEGRA_HSP_MBOX
> +	bool "Tegra HSP(Hardware Synchronization Primitives) Driver"
> +	depends on ARCH_TEGRA_186_SOC
> +	help
> +	  The Tegra HSP driver is used for the interprocessor communication
> +	  between different remote processors and host processors on Tegra186
> +	  and later SoCs. Say Y here if you want to have this support.
> +	  If unsure say N.
> +
>  config XGENE_SLIMPRO_MBOX
>  	tristate "APM SoC X-Gene SLIMpro Mailbox Controller"
>  	depends on ARCH_XGENE
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> index 0be3e742bb7d..26d8f91c7fea 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> @@ -25,3 +25,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TI_MESSAGE_MANAGER) += ti-msgmgr.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_XGENE_SLIMPRO_MBOX) += mailbox-xgene-slimpro.o
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_HI6220_MBOX)	+= hi6220-mailbox.o
> +
> +obj-${CONFIG_TEGRA_HSP_MBOX}	+= tegra-hsp.o
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c b/drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..93c3ef58f29f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,418 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2016, NVIDIA CORPORATION.  All rights reserved.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
> + * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
> + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for
> + * more details.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/mailbox_controller.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/mailbox/tegra186-hsp.h>
> +
> +#define HSP_INT_DIMENSIONING	0x380
> +#define HSP_nSM_OFFSET		0
> +#define HSP_nSS_OFFSET		4
> +#define HSP_nAS_OFFSET		8
> +#define HSP_nDB_OFFSET		12
> +#define HSP_nSI_OFFSET		16
> +#define HSP_nINT_MASK		0xf
> +
> +#define HSP_DB_REG_TRIGGER	0x0
> +#define HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE	0x4
> +#define HSP_DB_REG_RAW		0x8
> +#define HSP_DB_REG_PENDING	0xc
> +
> +#define HSP_DB_CCPLEX		1
> +#define HSP_DB_BPMP		3
> +
> +#define MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN 32

Is this an arbitrarily chosen number?

> +#define MAX_NUM_HSP_DB 7
> +
> +#define hsp_db_offset(i, d) \
> +	(d->base + ((1 + (d->nr_sm >> 1) + d->nr_ss + d->nr_as) << 16) + \
> +	(i) * 0x100)
> +
> +struct tegra_hsp_db_chan {
> +	int master_id;
> +	int db_id;

These should be unsigned? 

> +};
> +
> +struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan {
> +	int type;

This too...

> +	union {
> +		struct tegra_hsp_db_chan db_chan;
> +	};
> +};

Why do we need to use a union?

> +
> +struct tegra_hsp_mbox {
> +	struct mbox_controller *mbox;
> +	void __iomem *base;
> +	void __iomem *db_base[MAX_NUM_HSP_DB];
> +	int db_irq;
> +	int nr_sm;
> +	int nr_as;
> +	int nr_ss;
> +	int nr_db;
> +	int nr_si;
> +	spinlock_t lock;

You might need to change this to a mutex - see below.

> +};
> +
> +static inline u32 hsp_readl(void __iomem *base, int reg)
> +{
> +	return readl(base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void hsp_writel(void __iomem *base, int reg, u32 val)
> +{
> +	writel(val, base + reg);
> +	readl(base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static int hsp_db_can_ring(void __iomem *db_base)
> +{
> +	u32 reg;
> +
> +	reg = hsp_readl(db_base, HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE);
> +
> +	return !!(reg & BIT(HSP_DB_MASTER_CCPLEX));
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t hsp_db_irq(int irq, void *p)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = p;
> +	ulong val;

This should be u32 and...

> +	int master_id;
> +
> +	val = (ulong)hsp_readl(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX],
> +			       HSP_DB_REG_PENDING);

the cast should/can be removed (hsp_readl and hsp_writel both use u32)?

> +	hsp_writel(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_PENDING, val);
> +
> +	spin_lock(&hsp_mbox->lock);
> +	for_each_set_bit(master_id, &val, MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN) {
> +		struct mbox_chan *chan;
> +		struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *mchan;
> +		int i;
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN; i++) {
> +			chan = &hsp_mbox->mbox->chans[i];
> +
> +			if (!chan->con_priv)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			mchan = chan->con_priv;
> +			if (mchan->type == HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB &&
> +			    mchan->db_chan.master_id == master_id)
> +				break;
> +			chan = NULL;
> +		}

Like Alexandre, I didn't like this use of inner loop as well. But I will
add my comment to the other thread.

> +
> +		if (chan)
> +			mbox_chan_received_data(chan, NULL);
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&hsp_mbox->lock);
> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static int hsp_db_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *mchan = chan->con_priv;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_db_chan *db_chan = &mchan->db_chan;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = dev_get_drvdata(chan->mbox->dev);
> +
> +	hsp_writel(hsp_mbox->db_base[db_chan->db_id], HSP_DB_REG_TRIGGER, 1);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int hsp_db_startup(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *mchan = chan->con_priv;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_db_chan *db_chan = &mchan->db_chan;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = dev_get_drvdata(chan->mbox->dev);
> +	u32 val;
> +	unsigned long flag;
> +
> +	if (db_chan->master_id >= MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN) {

Is this a valid check? IIUC, MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN is independent of the
number of masters.

> +		dev_err(chan->mbox->dev, "invalid HSP chan: master ID: %d\n",
> +			db_chan->master_id);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&hsp_mbox->lock, flag);
> +	val = hsp_readl(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE);
> +	val |= BIT(db_chan->master_id); 
> +	hsp_writel(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE, val);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hsp_mbox->lock, flag);
> +
> +	if (!hsp_db_can_ring(hsp_mbox->db_base[db_chan->db_id]))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void hsp_db_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *mchan = chan->con_priv;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_db_chan *db_chan = &mchan->db_chan;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = dev_get_drvdata(chan->mbox->dev);
> +	u32 val;
> +	unsigned long flag;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&hsp_mbox->lock, flag);
> +	val = hsp_readl(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE);
> +	val &= ~BIT(db_chan->master_id);
> +	hsp_writel(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE, val);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hsp_mbox->lock, flag);
> +}
> +
> +static bool hsp_db_last_tx_done(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_hsp_db_init(struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox,
> +			     struct mbox_chan *mchan, int master_id)
> +{
> +	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(hsp_mbox->mbox->dev);
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!hsp_mbox->db_irq) {
> +		int i;
> +
> +		hsp_mbox->db_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "doorbell");
> +		ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, hsp_mbox->db_irq,
> +				       hsp_db_irq, IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
> +				       dev_name(&pdev->dev), hsp_mbox);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUM_HSP_DB; i++)
> +			hsp_mbox->db_base[i] = hsp_db_offset(i, hsp_mbox);
> +	}
> +
> +	hsp_mbox_chan = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hsp_mbox_chan),
> +				     GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!hsp_mbox_chan)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	hsp_mbox_chan->type = HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB;
> +	hsp_mbox_chan->db_chan.master_id = master_id;
> +	switch (master_id) {
> +	case HSP_DB_MASTER_BPMP:
> +		hsp_mbox_chan->db_chan.db_id = HSP_DB_BPMP;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		hsp_mbox_chan->db_chan.db_id = MAX_NUM_HSP_DB;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	mchan->con_priv = hsp_mbox_chan;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int hsp_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan = chan->con_priv;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	switch (hsp_mbox_chan->type) {
> +	case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
> +		ret = hsp_db_send_data(chan, data);
> +		break;
> +	default:

Should you return an error here?

> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int hsp_startup(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan = chan->con_priv;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	switch (hsp_mbox_chan->type) {
> +	case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
> +		ret = hsp_db_startup(chan);
> +		break;
> +	default:

And here too...?

> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void hsp_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan = chan->con_priv;
> +
> +	switch (hsp_mbox_chan->type) {
> +	case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
> +		hsp_db_shutdown(chan);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	chan->con_priv = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static bool hsp_last_tx_done(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan = chan->con_priv;
> +	bool ret = true;
> +
> +	switch (hsp_mbox_chan->type) {
> +	case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
> +		ret = hsp_db_last_tx_done(chan);

hsp_db_last_tx_done() return true - so we might as well make this parent
function to return true and remove hsp_db_last_tx_done()?

> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct mbox_chan_ops tegra_hsp_ops = {
> +	.send_data = hsp_send_data,
> +	.startup = hsp_startup,
> +	.shutdown = hsp_shutdown,
> +	.last_tx_done = hsp_last_tx_done,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id tegra_hsp_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra186-hsp" },
> +	{ }
> +};
> +
> +static struct mbox_chan *
> +of_hsp_mbox_xlate(struct mbox_controller *mbox,
> +		  const struct of_phandle_args *sp)
> +{
> +	int mbox_id = sp->args[0];
> +	int hsp_type = (mbox_id >> 16) & 0xf;

Wouldn't it be nicer if the shift and mask constants are made defines in
the DT bindings header (tegra186-hsp.h)?

> +	int master_id = mbox_id & 0xff;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = dev_get_drvdata(mbox->dev);
> +	struct mbox_chan *free_chan;
> +	int i, ret = 0;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&hsp_mbox->lock);

If you must use spin locks, you will have to use the irqsave/restore
veriants in this function (called from thread context).

> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < mbox->num_chans; i++) {
> +		free_chan = &mbox->chans[i];
> +		if (!free_chan->con_priv)
> +			break;
> +		free_chan = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!free_chan) {
> +		spin_unlock(&hsp_mbox->lock);
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> +	}

IMO, it will be cleaner & simpler if you move the above code (doing the
lookup) into a separate function that returns free_chan - and you can
reuse that in hsp_db_irq()

> +
> +	switch (hsp_type) {
> +	case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
> +		ret = tegra_hsp_db_init(hsp_mbox, free_chan, master_id);

tegra_hsp_db_init() uses devm_kzalloc and you are doing this holding a
spinlock.

> +		break;
> +	default:

Not returning error here will also cause resource leak (free_chan).

> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	spin_unlock(&hsp_mbox->lock);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		free_chan = ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> +
> +	return free_chan;
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_hsp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	u32 reg;
> +
> +	hsp_mbox = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hsp_mbox), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!hsp_mbox)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	hsp_mbox->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> +	if (IS_ERR(hsp_mbox->base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(hsp_mbox->base);
> +
> +	reg = hsp_readl(hsp_mbox->base, HSP_INT_DIMENSIONING);
> +	hsp_mbox->nr_sm = (reg >> HSP_nSM_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
> +	hsp_mbox->nr_ss = (reg >> HSP_nSS_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
> +	hsp_mbox->nr_as = (reg >> HSP_nAS_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
> +	hsp_mbox->nr_db = (reg >> HSP_nDB_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
> +	hsp_mbox->nr_si = (reg >> HSP_nSI_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
> +
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> +				      sizeof(*hsp_mbox->mbox), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!hsp_mbox->mbox)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->chans =
> +		devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN,
> +			     sizeof(*hsp_mbox->mbox->chans), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!hsp_mbox->mbox->chans)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->of_xlate = of_hsp_mbox_xlate;
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->num_chans = MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN;
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->txdone_irq = false;
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->txdone_poll = false;
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->ops = &tegra_hsp_ops;
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, hsp_mbox);
> +
> +	ret = mbox_controller_register(hsp_mbox->mbox);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		pr_err("tegra-hsp mbox: fail to register mailbox %d.\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	spin_lock_init(&hsp_mbox->lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_hsp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	if (hsp_mbox->mbox)
> +		mbox_controller_unregister(hsp_mbox->mbox);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver tegra_hsp_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "tegra-hsp",
> +		.of_match_table = tegra_hsp_match,
> +	},
> +	.probe = tegra_hsp_probe,
> +	.remove = tegra_hsp_remove,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init tegra_hsp_init(void)
> +{
> +	return platform_driver_register(&tegra_hsp_driver);
> +}
> +core_initcall(tegra_hsp_init);
> -- 
> 2.9.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sivaramn@nvidia.com (Sivaram Nair)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 02/10] mailbox: tegra-hsp: Add HSP(Hardware Synchronization Primitives) driver
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 14:10:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160707211016.GA9897@kickseed.nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160705090431.5852-3-josephl@nvidia.com>

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 05:04:23PM +0800, Joseph Lo wrote:
> The Tegra HSP mailbox driver implements the signaling doorbell-based
> interprocessor communication (IPC) for remote processors currently. The
> HSP HW modules support some different features for that, which are
> shared mailboxes, shared semaphores, arbitrated semaphores, and
> doorbells. And there are multiple HSP HW instances on the chip. So the
> driver is extendable to support more features for different IPC
> requirement.
> 
> The driver of remote processor can use it as a mailbox client and deal
> with the IPC protocol to synchronize the data communications.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com>
> ---
> Changes in V2:
> - Update the driver to support the binding changes in V2
> - it's extendable to support multiple HSP sub-modules on the same HSP HW block
>   now.
> ---
>  drivers/mailbox/Kconfig     |   9 +
>  drivers/mailbox/Makefile    |   2 +
>  drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c | 418 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 429 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> index 5305923752d2..fe584cb54720 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> @@ -114,6 +114,15 @@ config MAILBOX_TEST
>  	  Test client to help with testing new Controller driver
>  	  implementations.
>  
> +config TEGRA_HSP_MBOX
> +	bool "Tegra HSP(Hardware Synchronization Primitives) Driver"
> +	depends on ARCH_TEGRA_186_SOC
> +	help
> +	  The Tegra HSP driver is used for the interprocessor communication
> +	  between different remote processors and host processors on Tegra186
> +	  and later SoCs. Say Y here if you want to have this support.
> +	  If unsure say N.
> +
>  config XGENE_SLIMPRO_MBOX
>  	tristate "APM SoC X-Gene SLIMpro Mailbox Controller"
>  	depends on ARCH_XGENE
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> index 0be3e742bb7d..26d8f91c7fea 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> @@ -25,3 +25,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TI_MESSAGE_MANAGER) += ti-msgmgr.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_XGENE_SLIMPRO_MBOX) += mailbox-xgene-slimpro.o
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_HI6220_MBOX)	+= hi6220-mailbox.o
> +
> +obj-${CONFIG_TEGRA_HSP_MBOX}	+= tegra-hsp.o
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c b/drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..93c3ef58f29f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,418 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2016, NVIDIA CORPORATION.  All rights reserved.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
> + * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
> + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for
> + * more details.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/mailbox_controller.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/mailbox/tegra186-hsp.h>
> +
> +#define HSP_INT_DIMENSIONING	0x380
> +#define HSP_nSM_OFFSET		0
> +#define HSP_nSS_OFFSET		4
> +#define HSP_nAS_OFFSET		8
> +#define HSP_nDB_OFFSET		12
> +#define HSP_nSI_OFFSET		16
> +#define HSP_nINT_MASK		0xf
> +
> +#define HSP_DB_REG_TRIGGER	0x0
> +#define HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE	0x4
> +#define HSP_DB_REG_RAW		0x8
> +#define HSP_DB_REG_PENDING	0xc
> +
> +#define HSP_DB_CCPLEX		1
> +#define HSP_DB_BPMP		3
> +
> +#define MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN 32

Is this an arbitrarily chosen number?

> +#define MAX_NUM_HSP_DB 7
> +
> +#define hsp_db_offset(i, d) \
> +	(d->base + ((1 + (d->nr_sm >> 1) + d->nr_ss + d->nr_as) << 16) + \
> +	(i) * 0x100)
> +
> +struct tegra_hsp_db_chan {
> +	int master_id;
> +	int db_id;

These should be unsigned? 

> +};
> +
> +struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan {
> +	int type;

This too...

> +	union {
> +		struct tegra_hsp_db_chan db_chan;
> +	};
> +};

Why do we need to use a union?

> +
> +struct tegra_hsp_mbox {
> +	struct mbox_controller *mbox;
> +	void __iomem *base;
> +	void __iomem *db_base[MAX_NUM_HSP_DB];
> +	int db_irq;
> +	int nr_sm;
> +	int nr_as;
> +	int nr_ss;
> +	int nr_db;
> +	int nr_si;
> +	spinlock_t lock;

You might need to change this to a mutex - see below.

> +};
> +
> +static inline u32 hsp_readl(void __iomem *base, int reg)
> +{
> +	return readl(base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void hsp_writel(void __iomem *base, int reg, u32 val)
> +{
> +	writel(val, base + reg);
> +	readl(base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static int hsp_db_can_ring(void __iomem *db_base)
> +{
> +	u32 reg;
> +
> +	reg = hsp_readl(db_base, HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE);
> +
> +	return !!(reg & BIT(HSP_DB_MASTER_CCPLEX));
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t hsp_db_irq(int irq, void *p)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = p;
> +	ulong val;

This should be u32 and...

> +	int master_id;
> +
> +	val = (ulong)hsp_readl(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX],
> +			       HSP_DB_REG_PENDING);

the cast should/can be removed (hsp_readl and hsp_writel both use u32)?

> +	hsp_writel(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_PENDING, val);
> +
> +	spin_lock(&hsp_mbox->lock);
> +	for_each_set_bit(master_id, &val, MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN) {
> +		struct mbox_chan *chan;
> +		struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *mchan;
> +		int i;
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN; i++) {
> +			chan = &hsp_mbox->mbox->chans[i];
> +
> +			if (!chan->con_priv)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			mchan = chan->con_priv;
> +			if (mchan->type == HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB &&
> +			    mchan->db_chan.master_id == master_id)
> +				break;
> +			chan = NULL;
> +		}

Like Alexandre, I didn't like this use of inner loop as well. But I will
add my comment to the other thread.

> +
> +		if (chan)
> +			mbox_chan_received_data(chan, NULL);
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&hsp_mbox->lock);
> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static int hsp_db_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *mchan = chan->con_priv;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_db_chan *db_chan = &mchan->db_chan;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = dev_get_drvdata(chan->mbox->dev);
> +
> +	hsp_writel(hsp_mbox->db_base[db_chan->db_id], HSP_DB_REG_TRIGGER, 1);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int hsp_db_startup(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *mchan = chan->con_priv;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_db_chan *db_chan = &mchan->db_chan;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = dev_get_drvdata(chan->mbox->dev);
> +	u32 val;
> +	unsigned long flag;
> +
> +	if (db_chan->master_id >= MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN) {

Is this a valid check? IIUC, MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN is independent of the
number of masters.

> +		dev_err(chan->mbox->dev, "invalid HSP chan: master ID: %d\n",
> +			db_chan->master_id);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&hsp_mbox->lock, flag);
> +	val = hsp_readl(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE);
> +	val |= BIT(db_chan->master_id); 
> +	hsp_writel(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE, val);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hsp_mbox->lock, flag);
> +
> +	if (!hsp_db_can_ring(hsp_mbox->db_base[db_chan->db_id]))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void hsp_db_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *mchan = chan->con_priv;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_db_chan *db_chan = &mchan->db_chan;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = dev_get_drvdata(chan->mbox->dev);
> +	u32 val;
> +	unsigned long flag;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&hsp_mbox->lock, flag);
> +	val = hsp_readl(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE);
> +	val &= ~BIT(db_chan->master_id);
> +	hsp_writel(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE, val);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hsp_mbox->lock, flag);
> +}
> +
> +static bool hsp_db_last_tx_done(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_hsp_db_init(struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox,
> +			     struct mbox_chan *mchan, int master_id)
> +{
> +	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(hsp_mbox->mbox->dev);
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!hsp_mbox->db_irq) {
> +		int i;
> +
> +		hsp_mbox->db_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "doorbell");
> +		ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, hsp_mbox->db_irq,
> +				       hsp_db_irq, IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
> +				       dev_name(&pdev->dev), hsp_mbox);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUM_HSP_DB; i++)
> +			hsp_mbox->db_base[i] = hsp_db_offset(i, hsp_mbox);
> +	}
> +
> +	hsp_mbox_chan = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hsp_mbox_chan),
> +				     GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!hsp_mbox_chan)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	hsp_mbox_chan->type = HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB;
> +	hsp_mbox_chan->db_chan.master_id = master_id;
> +	switch (master_id) {
> +	case HSP_DB_MASTER_BPMP:
> +		hsp_mbox_chan->db_chan.db_id = HSP_DB_BPMP;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		hsp_mbox_chan->db_chan.db_id = MAX_NUM_HSP_DB;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	mchan->con_priv = hsp_mbox_chan;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int hsp_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan = chan->con_priv;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	switch (hsp_mbox_chan->type) {
> +	case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
> +		ret = hsp_db_send_data(chan, data);
> +		break;
> +	default:

Should you return an error here?

> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int hsp_startup(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan = chan->con_priv;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	switch (hsp_mbox_chan->type) {
> +	case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
> +		ret = hsp_db_startup(chan);
> +		break;
> +	default:

And here too...?

> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void hsp_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan = chan->con_priv;
> +
> +	switch (hsp_mbox_chan->type) {
> +	case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
> +		hsp_db_shutdown(chan);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	chan->con_priv = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static bool hsp_last_tx_done(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan = chan->con_priv;
> +	bool ret = true;
> +
> +	switch (hsp_mbox_chan->type) {
> +	case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
> +		ret = hsp_db_last_tx_done(chan);

hsp_db_last_tx_done() return true - so we might as well make this parent
function to return true and remove hsp_db_last_tx_done()?

> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct mbox_chan_ops tegra_hsp_ops = {
> +	.send_data = hsp_send_data,
> +	.startup = hsp_startup,
> +	.shutdown = hsp_shutdown,
> +	.last_tx_done = hsp_last_tx_done,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id tegra_hsp_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra186-hsp" },
> +	{ }
> +};
> +
> +static struct mbox_chan *
> +of_hsp_mbox_xlate(struct mbox_controller *mbox,
> +		  const struct of_phandle_args *sp)
> +{
> +	int mbox_id = sp->args[0];
> +	int hsp_type = (mbox_id >> 16) & 0xf;

Wouldn't it be nicer if the shift and mask constants are made defines in
the DT bindings header (tegra186-hsp.h)?

> +	int master_id = mbox_id & 0xff;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = dev_get_drvdata(mbox->dev);
> +	struct mbox_chan *free_chan;
> +	int i, ret = 0;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&hsp_mbox->lock);

If you must use spin locks, you will have to use the irqsave/restore
veriants in this function (called from thread context).

> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < mbox->num_chans; i++) {
> +		free_chan = &mbox->chans[i];
> +		if (!free_chan->con_priv)
> +			break;
> +		free_chan = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!free_chan) {
> +		spin_unlock(&hsp_mbox->lock);
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> +	}

IMO, it will be cleaner & simpler if you move the above code (doing the
lookup) into a separate function that returns free_chan - and you can
reuse that in hsp_db_irq()

> +
> +	switch (hsp_type) {
> +	case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
> +		ret = tegra_hsp_db_init(hsp_mbox, free_chan, master_id);

tegra_hsp_db_init() uses devm_kzalloc and you are doing this holding a
spinlock.

> +		break;
> +	default:

Not returning error here will also cause resource leak (free_chan).

> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	spin_unlock(&hsp_mbox->lock);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		free_chan = ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> +
> +	return free_chan;
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_hsp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	u32 reg;
> +
> +	hsp_mbox = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hsp_mbox), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!hsp_mbox)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	hsp_mbox->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> +	if (IS_ERR(hsp_mbox->base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(hsp_mbox->base);
> +
> +	reg = hsp_readl(hsp_mbox->base, HSP_INT_DIMENSIONING);
> +	hsp_mbox->nr_sm = (reg >> HSP_nSM_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
> +	hsp_mbox->nr_ss = (reg >> HSP_nSS_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
> +	hsp_mbox->nr_as = (reg >> HSP_nAS_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
> +	hsp_mbox->nr_db = (reg >> HSP_nDB_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
> +	hsp_mbox->nr_si = (reg >> HSP_nSI_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
> +
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> +				      sizeof(*hsp_mbox->mbox), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!hsp_mbox->mbox)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->chans =
> +		devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN,
> +			     sizeof(*hsp_mbox->mbox->chans), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!hsp_mbox->mbox->chans)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->of_xlate = of_hsp_mbox_xlate;
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->num_chans = MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN;
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->txdone_irq = false;
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->txdone_poll = false;
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->ops = &tegra_hsp_ops;
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, hsp_mbox);
> +
> +	ret = mbox_controller_register(hsp_mbox->mbox);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		pr_err("tegra-hsp mbox: fail to register mailbox %d.\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	spin_lock_init(&hsp_mbox->lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_hsp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	if (hsp_mbox->mbox)
> +		mbox_controller_unregister(hsp_mbox->mbox);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver tegra_hsp_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "tegra-hsp",
> +		.of_match_table = tegra_hsp_match,
> +	},
> +	.probe = tegra_hsp_probe,
> +	.remove = tegra_hsp_remove,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init tegra_hsp_init(void)
> +{
> +	return platform_driver_register(&tegra_hsp_driver);
> +}
> +core_initcall(tegra_hsp_init);
> -- 
> 2.9.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sivaram Nair <sivaramn@nvidia.com>
To: Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	<linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>,
	Matthew Longnecker <MLongnecker@nvidia.com>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 02/10] mailbox: tegra-hsp: Add HSP(Hardware Synchronization Primitives) driver
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 14:10:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160707211016.GA9897@kickseed.nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160705090431.5852-3-josephl@nvidia.com>

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 05:04:23PM +0800, Joseph Lo wrote:
> The Tegra HSP mailbox driver implements the signaling doorbell-based
> interprocessor communication (IPC) for remote processors currently. The
> HSP HW modules support some different features for that, which are
> shared mailboxes, shared semaphores, arbitrated semaphores, and
> doorbells. And there are multiple HSP HW instances on the chip. So the
> driver is extendable to support more features for different IPC
> requirement.
> 
> The driver of remote processor can use it as a mailbox client and deal
> with the IPC protocol to synchronize the data communications.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com>
> ---
> Changes in V2:
> - Update the driver to support the binding changes in V2
> - it's extendable to support multiple HSP sub-modules on the same HSP HW block
>   now.
> ---
>  drivers/mailbox/Kconfig     |   9 +
>  drivers/mailbox/Makefile    |   2 +
>  drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c | 418 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 429 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> index 5305923752d2..fe584cb54720 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> @@ -114,6 +114,15 @@ config MAILBOX_TEST
>  	  Test client to help with testing new Controller driver
>  	  implementations.
>  
> +config TEGRA_HSP_MBOX
> +	bool "Tegra HSP(Hardware Synchronization Primitives) Driver"
> +	depends on ARCH_TEGRA_186_SOC
> +	help
> +	  The Tegra HSP driver is used for the interprocessor communication
> +	  between different remote processors and host processors on Tegra186
> +	  and later SoCs. Say Y here if you want to have this support.
> +	  If unsure say N.
> +
>  config XGENE_SLIMPRO_MBOX
>  	tristate "APM SoC X-Gene SLIMpro Mailbox Controller"
>  	depends on ARCH_XGENE
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> index 0be3e742bb7d..26d8f91c7fea 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> @@ -25,3 +25,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TI_MESSAGE_MANAGER) += ti-msgmgr.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_XGENE_SLIMPRO_MBOX) += mailbox-xgene-slimpro.o
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_HI6220_MBOX)	+= hi6220-mailbox.o
> +
> +obj-${CONFIG_TEGRA_HSP_MBOX}	+= tegra-hsp.o
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c b/drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..93c3ef58f29f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/tegra-hsp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,418 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2016, NVIDIA CORPORATION.  All rights reserved.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
> + * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
> + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for
> + * more details.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/mailbox_controller.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/mailbox/tegra186-hsp.h>
> +
> +#define HSP_INT_DIMENSIONING	0x380
> +#define HSP_nSM_OFFSET		0
> +#define HSP_nSS_OFFSET		4
> +#define HSP_nAS_OFFSET		8
> +#define HSP_nDB_OFFSET		12
> +#define HSP_nSI_OFFSET		16
> +#define HSP_nINT_MASK		0xf
> +
> +#define HSP_DB_REG_TRIGGER	0x0
> +#define HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE	0x4
> +#define HSP_DB_REG_RAW		0x8
> +#define HSP_DB_REG_PENDING	0xc
> +
> +#define HSP_DB_CCPLEX		1
> +#define HSP_DB_BPMP		3
> +
> +#define MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN 32

Is this an arbitrarily chosen number?

> +#define MAX_NUM_HSP_DB 7
> +
> +#define hsp_db_offset(i, d) \
> +	(d->base + ((1 + (d->nr_sm >> 1) + d->nr_ss + d->nr_as) << 16) + \
> +	(i) * 0x100)
> +
> +struct tegra_hsp_db_chan {
> +	int master_id;
> +	int db_id;

These should be unsigned? 

> +};
> +
> +struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan {
> +	int type;

This too...

> +	union {
> +		struct tegra_hsp_db_chan db_chan;
> +	};
> +};

Why do we need to use a union?

> +
> +struct tegra_hsp_mbox {
> +	struct mbox_controller *mbox;
> +	void __iomem *base;
> +	void __iomem *db_base[MAX_NUM_HSP_DB];
> +	int db_irq;
> +	int nr_sm;
> +	int nr_as;
> +	int nr_ss;
> +	int nr_db;
> +	int nr_si;
> +	spinlock_t lock;

You might need to change this to a mutex - see below.

> +};
> +
> +static inline u32 hsp_readl(void __iomem *base, int reg)
> +{
> +	return readl(base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void hsp_writel(void __iomem *base, int reg, u32 val)
> +{
> +	writel(val, base + reg);
> +	readl(base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static int hsp_db_can_ring(void __iomem *db_base)
> +{
> +	u32 reg;
> +
> +	reg = hsp_readl(db_base, HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE);
> +
> +	return !!(reg & BIT(HSP_DB_MASTER_CCPLEX));
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t hsp_db_irq(int irq, void *p)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = p;
> +	ulong val;

This should be u32 and...

> +	int master_id;
> +
> +	val = (ulong)hsp_readl(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX],
> +			       HSP_DB_REG_PENDING);

the cast should/can be removed (hsp_readl and hsp_writel both use u32)?

> +	hsp_writel(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_PENDING, val);
> +
> +	spin_lock(&hsp_mbox->lock);
> +	for_each_set_bit(master_id, &val, MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN) {
> +		struct mbox_chan *chan;
> +		struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *mchan;
> +		int i;
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN; i++) {
> +			chan = &hsp_mbox->mbox->chans[i];
> +
> +			if (!chan->con_priv)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			mchan = chan->con_priv;
> +			if (mchan->type == HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB &&
> +			    mchan->db_chan.master_id == master_id)
> +				break;
> +			chan = NULL;
> +		}

Like Alexandre, I didn't like this use of inner loop as well. But I will
add my comment to the other thread.

> +
> +		if (chan)
> +			mbox_chan_received_data(chan, NULL);
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&hsp_mbox->lock);
> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static int hsp_db_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *mchan = chan->con_priv;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_db_chan *db_chan = &mchan->db_chan;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = dev_get_drvdata(chan->mbox->dev);
> +
> +	hsp_writel(hsp_mbox->db_base[db_chan->db_id], HSP_DB_REG_TRIGGER, 1);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int hsp_db_startup(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *mchan = chan->con_priv;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_db_chan *db_chan = &mchan->db_chan;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = dev_get_drvdata(chan->mbox->dev);
> +	u32 val;
> +	unsigned long flag;
> +
> +	if (db_chan->master_id >= MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN) {

Is this a valid check? IIUC, MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN is independent of the
number of masters.

> +		dev_err(chan->mbox->dev, "invalid HSP chan: master ID: %d\n",
> +			db_chan->master_id);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&hsp_mbox->lock, flag);
> +	val = hsp_readl(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE);
> +	val |= BIT(db_chan->master_id); 
> +	hsp_writel(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE, val);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hsp_mbox->lock, flag);
> +
> +	if (!hsp_db_can_ring(hsp_mbox->db_base[db_chan->db_id]))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void hsp_db_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *mchan = chan->con_priv;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_db_chan *db_chan = &mchan->db_chan;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = dev_get_drvdata(chan->mbox->dev);
> +	u32 val;
> +	unsigned long flag;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&hsp_mbox->lock, flag);
> +	val = hsp_readl(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE);
> +	val &= ~BIT(db_chan->master_id);
> +	hsp_writel(hsp_mbox->db_base[HSP_DB_CCPLEX], HSP_DB_REG_ENABLE, val);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hsp_mbox->lock, flag);
> +}
> +
> +static bool hsp_db_last_tx_done(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_hsp_db_init(struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox,
> +			     struct mbox_chan *mchan, int master_id)
> +{
> +	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(hsp_mbox->mbox->dev);
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!hsp_mbox->db_irq) {
> +		int i;
> +
> +		hsp_mbox->db_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "doorbell");
> +		ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, hsp_mbox->db_irq,
> +				       hsp_db_irq, IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
> +				       dev_name(&pdev->dev), hsp_mbox);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUM_HSP_DB; i++)
> +			hsp_mbox->db_base[i] = hsp_db_offset(i, hsp_mbox);
> +	}
> +
> +	hsp_mbox_chan = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hsp_mbox_chan),
> +				     GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!hsp_mbox_chan)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	hsp_mbox_chan->type = HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB;
> +	hsp_mbox_chan->db_chan.master_id = master_id;
> +	switch (master_id) {
> +	case HSP_DB_MASTER_BPMP:
> +		hsp_mbox_chan->db_chan.db_id = HSP_DB_BPMP;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		hsp_mbox_chan->db_chan.db_id = MAX_NUM_HSP_DB;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	mchan->con_priv = hsp_mbox_chan;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int hsp_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan = chan->con_priv;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	switch (hsp_mbox_chan->type) {
> +	case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
> +		ret = hsp_db_send_data(chan, data);
> +		break;
> +	default:

Should you return an error here?

> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int hsp_startup(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan = chan->con_priv;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	switch (hsp_mbox_chan->type) {
> +	case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
> +		ret = hsp_db_startup(chan);
> +		break;
> +	default:

And here too...?

> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void hsp_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan = chan->con_priv;
> +
> +	switch (hsp_mbox_chan->type) {
> +	case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
> +		hsp_db_shutdown(chan);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	chan->con_priv = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static bool hsp_last_tx_done(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox_chan *hsp_mbox_chan = chan->con_priv;
> +	bool ret = true;
> +
> +	switch (hsp_mbox_chan->type) {
> +	case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
> +		ret = hsp_db_last_tx_done(chan);

hsp_db_last_tx_done() return true - so we might as well make this parent
function to return true and remove hsp_db_last_tx_done()?

> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct mbox_chan_ops tegra_hsp_ops = {
> +	.send_data = hsp_send_data,
> +	.startup = hsp_startup,
> +	.shutdown = hsp_shutdown,
> +	.last_tx_done = hsp_last_tx_done,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id tegra_hsp_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "nvidia,tegra186-hsp" },
> +	{ }
> +};
> +
> +static struct mbox_chan *
> +of_hsp_mbox_xlate(struct mbox_controller *mbox,
> +		  const struct of_phandle_args *sp)
> +{
> +	int mbox_id = sp->args[0];
> +	int hsp_type = (mbox_id >> 16) & 0xf;

Wouldn't it be nicer if the shift and mask constants are made defines in
the DT bindings header (tegra186-hsp.h)?

> +	int master_id = mbox_id & 0xff;
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = dev_get_drvdata(mbox->dev);
> +	struct mbox_chan *free_chan;
> +	int i, ret = 0;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&hsp_mbox->lock);

If you must use spin locks, you will have to use the irqsave/restore
veriants in this function (called from thread context).

> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < mbox->num_chans; i++) {
> +		free_chan = &mbox->chans[i];
> +		if (!free_chan->con_priv)
> +			break;
> +		free_chan = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!free_chan) {
> +		spin_unlock(&hsp_mbox->lock);
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> +	}

IMO, it will be cleaner & simpler if you move the above code (doing the
lookup) into a separate function that returns free_chan - and you can
reuse that in hsp_db_irq()

> +
> +	switch (hsp_type) {
> +	case HSP_MBOX_TYPE_DB:
> +		ret = tegra_hsp_db_init(hsp_mbox, free_chan, master_id);

tegra_hsp_db_init() uses devm_kzalloc and you are doing this holding a
spinlock.

> +		break;
> +	default:

Not returning error here will also cause resource leak (free_chan).

> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	spin_unlock(&hsp_mbox->lock);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		free_chan = ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> +
> +	return free_chan;
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_hsp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	u32 reg;
> +
> +	hsp_mbox = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hsp_mbox), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!hsp_mbox)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	hsp_mbox->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> +	if (IS_ERR(hsp_mbox->base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(hsp_mbox->base);
> +
> +	reg = hsp_readl(hsp_mbox->base, HSP_INT_DIMENSIONING);
> +	hsp_mbox->nr_sm = (reg >> HSP_nSM_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
> +	hsp_mbox->nr_ss = (reg >> HSP_nSS_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
> +	hsp_mbox->nr_as = (reg >> HSP_nAS_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
> +	hsp_mbox->nr_db = (reg >> HSP_nDB_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
> +	hsp_mbox->nr_si = (reg >> HSP_nSI_OFFSET) & HSP_nINT_MASK;
> +
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> +				      sizeof(*hsp_mbox->mbox), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!hsp_mbox->mbox)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->chans =
> +		devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN,
> +			     sizeof(*hsp_mbox->mbox->chans), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!hsp_mbox->mbox->chans)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->of_xlate = of_hsp_mbox_xlate;
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->num_chans = MAX_NUM_HSP_CHAN;
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->txdone_irq = false;
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->txdone_poll = false;
> +	hsp_mbox->mbox->ops = &tegra_hsp_ops;
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, hsp_mbox);
> +
> +	ret = mbox_controller_register(hsp_mbox->mbox);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		pr_err("tegra-hsp mbox: fail to register mailbox %d.\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	spin_lock_init(&hsp_mbox->lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_hsp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct tegra_hsp_mbox *hsp_mbox = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	if (hsp_mbox->mbox)
> +		mbox_controller_unregister(hsp_mbox->mbox);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver tegra_hsp_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "tegra-hsp",
> +		.of_match_table = tegra_hsp_match,
> +	},
> +	.probe = tegra_hsp_probe,
> +	.remove = tegra_hsp_remove,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init tegra_hsp_init(void)
> +{
> +	return platform_driver_register(&tegra_hsp_driver);
> +}
> +core_initcall(tegra_hsp_init);
> -- 
> 2.9.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-07-07 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 147+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-05  9:04 [PATCH V2 00/10] arm64: tegra: add BPMP support Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04 ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04 ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04 ` [PATCH V2 03/10] Documentation: dt-bindings: firmware: tegra: add bindings of the BPMP Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04   ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04   ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-06 11:42   ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-07-06 11:42     ` Alexandre Courbot
     [not found]     ` <CAAVeFuJwhQ=L803W7K+e5_VUKrfB2NyCz+WMR91QuvKgmv1ofw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-07  6:25       ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-07  6:25         ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-07  6:25         ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-11 14:22   ` Rob Herring
2016-07-11 14:22     ` Rob Herring
2016-07-11 16:05     ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-11 16:05       ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-11 16:05       ` Stephen Warren
     [not found]       ` <5783C3DE.3080708-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-18  7:44         ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-18  7:44           ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-18  7:44           ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-18 16:18           ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-18 16:18             ` Stephen Warren
     [not found]   ` <20160705090431.5852-4-josephl-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-06 17:03     ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-06 17:03       ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-06 17:03       ` Stephen Warren
     [not found]       ` <577D39DF.600-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-07  6:26         ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-07  6:26           ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-07  6:26           ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-13 19:41     ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-13 19:41       ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-13 19:41       ` Stephen Warren
     [not found]       ` <5786995A.1090706-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-18  6:42         ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-18  6:42           ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-18  6:42           ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04 ` [PATCH V2 04/10] firmware: tegra: add IVC library Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04   ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04   ` Joseph Lo
     [not found]   ` <20160705090431.5852-5-josephl-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-07 11:16     ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-07-07 11:16       ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-07-07 11:16       ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-07-09 23:45   ` Paul Gortmaker
2016-07-09 23:45     ` Paul Gortmaker
2016-07-05  9:04 ` [PATCH V2 06/10] soc/tegra: Add Tegra186 support Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04   ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04   ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04 ` [PATCH V2 07/10] arm64: defconfig: Enable Tegra186 SoC Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04   ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04   ` Joseph Lo
     [not found] ` <20160705090431.5852-1-josephl-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-05  9:04   ` [PATCH V2 01/10] Documentation: dt-bindings: mailbox: tegra: Add binding for HSP mailbox Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04     ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04     ` Joseph Lo
     [not found]     ` <20160705090431.5852-2-josephl-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-06 17:02       ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-06 17:02         ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-06 17:02         ` Stephen Warren
     [not found]         ` <577D39B6.701-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-07  6:24           ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-07  6:24             ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-07  6:24             ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-07 18:13       ` Sivaram Nair
2016-07-07 18:13         ` Sivaram Nair
2016-07-07 18:13         ` Sivaram Nair
     [not found]         ` <20160707181356.GA6864-5el8CFYymRZDw2glCA4ptUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-07 18:35           ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-07 18:35             ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-07 18:35             ` Stephen Warren
     [not found]             ` <577EA0D6.9020308-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-07 18:44               ` Sivaram Nair
2016-07-07 18:44                 ` Sivaram Nair
2016-07-07 18:44                 ` Sivaram Nair
2016-07-11 14:14               ` Rob Herring
2016-07-11 14:14                 ` Rob Herring
2016-07-11 14:14                 ` Rob Herring
2016-07-11 16:08                 ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-11 16:08                   ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-11 16:08                   ` Stephen Warren
     [not found]                   ` <5783C468.2030708-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-18 23:13                     ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-18 23:13                       ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-18 23:13                       ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-19  7:09                       ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-19  7:09                         ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-19  7:09                         ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04   ` [PATCH V2 02/10] mailbox: tegra-hsp: Add HSP(Hardware Synchronization Primitives) driver Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04     ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04     ` Joseph Lo
     [not found]     ` <20160705090431.5852-3-josephl-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-06  7:05       ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-07-06  7:05         ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-07-06  7:05         ` Alexandre Courbot
     [not found]         ` <CAAVeFuK1nY2M3vU9j-D5TJwZCEj+sXRDy=W4XMTqSdsveTTQww-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-06  9:06           ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-06  9:06             ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-06  9:06             ` Joseph Lo
     [not found]             ` <577CCA0A.4000203-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-06 12:23               ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-07-06 12:23                 ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-07-06 12:23                 ` Alexandre Courbot
     [not found]                 ` <CAAVeFuLHmYVt870UKPwhdqxi+dJWCskbswwKdVVntDJYkA5YTw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-07  6:37                   ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-07  6:37                     ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-07  6:37                     ` Joseph Lo
     [not found]                     ` <577DF8A7.4070209-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-07 21:33                       ` Sivaram Nair
2016-07-07 21:33                         ` Sivaram Nair
2016-07-07 21:33                         ` Sivaram Nair
     [not found]                         ` <20160707213313.GB9897-5el8CFYymRZDw2glCA4ptUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-18  8:58                           ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-18  8:58                             ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-18  8:58                             ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-06 16:50               ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-06 16:50                 ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-06 16:50                 ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-07  6:49                 ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-07  6:49                   ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-07 21:10     ` Sivaram Nair [this message]
2016-07-07 21:10       ` Sivaram Nair
2016-07-07 21:10       ` Sivaram Nair
     [not found]       ` <20160707211016.GA9897-5el8CFYymRZDw2glCA4ptUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-18  8:51         ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-18  8:51           ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-18  8:51           ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04   ` [PATCH V2 05/10] firmware: tegra: add BPMP support Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04     ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04     ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-06 11:39     ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-07-06 11:39       ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-07-06 11:39       ` Alexandre Courbot
     [not found]       ` <CAAVeFuKvp4d=RoPZGGLmhqXs1oHZPrEOxTJd_b6b7-rHq_mqqg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-06 16:39         ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-06 16:39           ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-06 16:39           ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-06 16:47         ` Matt Longnecker
2016-07-06 16:47           ` Matt Longnecker
2016-07-06 16:47           ` Matt Longnecker
2016-07-07  2:24           ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-07-07  2:24             ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-07-07  2:24             ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-07-07  8:17       ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-07  8:17         ` Joseph Lo
     [not found]         ` <577E102E.8070602-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-07 10:18           ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-07-07 10:18             ` Alexandre Courbot
2016-07-07 10:18             ` Alexandre Courbot
     [not found]             ` <CAAVeFu+6UO3_Zi3VTec0Qf6KBT2xY-usFNnd26raUQZ9ieEJbg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-07 19:55               ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-07 19:55                 ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-07 19:55                 ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-08 20:19             ` Sivaram Nair
2016-07-08 20:19               ` Sivaram Nair
2016-07-08 20:19               ` Sivaram Nair
     [not found]     ` <20160705090431.5852-6-josephl-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-08 17:55       ` Sivaram Nair
2016-07-08 17:55         ` Sivaram Nair
2016-07-08 17:55         ` Sivaram Nair
2016-07-05  9:04   ` [PATCH V2 08/10] arm64: dts: tegra: Add Tegra186 support Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04     ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04     ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04 ` [PATCH V2 09/10] arm64: dts: tegra: Add NVIDIA Tegra186 P3310 main board support Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04   ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04   ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04 ` [PATCH V2 10/10] arm64: dts: tegra: Add NVIDIA P2771 " Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04   ` Joseph Lo
2016-07-05  9:04   ` Joseph Lo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160707211016.GA9897@kickseed.nvidia.com \
    --to=sivaramn@nvidia.com \
    --cc=MLongnecker@nvidia.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
    --cc=josephl@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.