From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:3203 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751269AbcGHFdB (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2016 01:33:01 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:09:38 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Niklas =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F6derlund?= Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, geert+renesas@glider.be, laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com, mfarooq@visteon.com Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] Residue patches for rcar-dmac from renesas-drivers Message-ID: <20160708053937.GO12591@localhost> References: <20160630151518.32329-1-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20160630151518.32329-1-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 05:15:14PM +0200, Niklas S�derlund wrote: > Hi all, > > I have looked over the DMA residue branches in renesas-drivers tree > (topic/rcar-dmac-hamza-v3 and topic/rcar-dmac-residue-v1) hoping to > bring them to upstream. The original author for the bulk of the patches > Hamza Farooq have not shown any activity since autumn 2015. > > In this cover letter I talk about all the patches in the above branches > but for obvious reasons only patches I think should be forwarded to > upstream are included in the series. All patches are based on top of > v4.7-rc1 and are tested on Koelsch using Geerts sertest tool to generate > DMA traffic. The highest baud I could get to work at was 921600 bps. > From reading the original mail threads my conclusion is that this is > good enough since all errors reported by Hamza Farooq where related to > the serial sh-sci driver. Applied all, thanks -- ~Vinod