Re: [WireGuard] [ANNOUNCE] Snapshot `experimental-0.0.20160708.1` Available

[Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>]

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 22:21:09 +0200,
  "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> wrote:
>> It looks like initially it does 0 length udp packets for keep alive and the
>> authenticated keep alives don't seem to happen until after some data is
>> sent.
>
>I suspect you forgot to rmmod the previous module before trying this
>branch. There are no 0 length udp packets sent anywhere in this
>branch's code paths.

Yep, that was it. It allowed a remote connection at start up without 
having to manually send traffic out locally first. So it looks like 
it is working as expected.

Right now I am testing through a stateful firewall that blocks the 
inbound connection unless it is related to an already established 
connection. That isn't exactly the same as nat, but should work similarly 
for testing purposes.