All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20160708233003.GO27480@dastard>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 516181d..a3569d0 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -55,3 +55,24 @@ On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 09:24:27AM -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
 > 
 > Since the first is the originally intended behavior, and the second fixes it
 > up, I'll just send it along in a single patch if that's preferred.
+
+>From the XFS perspective, the second change makes the first change
+completely redundant. We don't need to care how NFS is configured,
+all we care about is whether the exportfs block ops need to be
+compiled in.
+
+One patch to fix it all is fine by me - it's a simple, obvious
+change and it can be put through the NFS tree without causing us any
+problems...
+
+Cheers,
+
+Dave.
+-- 
+Dave Chinner
+david@fromorbit.com
+
+_______________________________________________
+xfs mailing list
+xfs@oss.sgi.com
+http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 2af7df8..0b5e418 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -6,12 +6,12 @@
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/2] abstract block export operations from nfsd layouts\0"
  "Date\0Sat, 9 Jul 2016 09:30:03 +1000\0"
  "To\0Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>\0"
- "Cc\0xfs@oss.sgi.com"
-  linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
+ "Cc\0linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org"
+  xfs@oss.sgi.com
+  bfields@fieldses.org
   Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-  Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
- " bfields@fieldses.org\0"
+  linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
+ " Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 09:24:27AM -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote:\n"
@@ -70,6 +70,27 @@
  ">  - the addition of CONFIG_EXPORTFS_BLOCK_OPS.\n"
  "> \n"
  "> Since the first is the originally intended behavior, and the second fixes it\n"
- > up, I'll just send it along in a single patch if that's preferred.
+ "> up, I'll just send it along in a single patch if that's preferred.\n"
+ "\n"
+ ">From the XFS perspective, the second change makes the first change\n"
+ "completely redundant. We don't need to care how NFS is configured,\n"
+ "all we care about is whether the exportfs block ops need to be\n"
+ "compiled in.\n"
+ "\n"
+ "One patch to fix it all is fine by me - it's a simple, obvious\n"
+ "change and it can be put through the NFS tree without causing us any\n"
+ "problems...\n"
+ "\n"
+ "Cheers,\n"
+ "\n"
+ "Dave.\n"
+ "-- \n"
+ "Dave Chinner\n"
+ "david@fromorbit.com\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "xfs mailing list\n"
+ "xfs@oss.sgi.com\n"
+ http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
 
-2f2ec8c9408e0310f9c06bc086d23867f2a342a3105205d86627ee7417239e78
+8fdf91cff230a1e1b9957c2dafa86e1cddbf56c260e09a22938528da287a2dd4

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index 516181d..7b431ea 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -55,3 +55,19 @@ On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 09:24:27AM -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
 > 
 > Since the first is the originally intended behavior, and the second fixes it
 > up, I'll just send it along in a single patch if that's preferred.
+
+>From the XFS perspective, the second change makes the first change
+completely redundant. We don't need to care how NFS is configured,
+all we care about is whether the exportfs block ops need to be
+compiled in.
+
+One patch to fix it all is fine by me - it's a simple, obvious
+change and it can be put through the NFS tree without causing us any
+problems...
+
+Cheers,
+
+Dave.
+-- 
+Dave Chinner
+david@fromorbit.com
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index 2af7df8..e9756a8 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -70,6 +70,22 @@
  ">  - the addition of CONFIG_EXPORTFS_BLOCK_OPS.\n"
  "> \n"
  "> Since the first is the originally intended behavior, and the second fixes it\n"
- > up, I'll just send it along in a single patch if that's preferred.
+ "> up, I'll just send it along in a single patch if that's preferred.\n"
+ "\n"
+ ">From the XFS perspective, the second change makes the first change\n"
+ "completely redundant. We don't need to care how NFS is configured,\n"
+ "all we care about is whether the exportfs block ops need to be\n"
+ "compiled in.\n"
+ "\n"
+ "One patch to fix it all is fine by me - it's a simple, obvious\n"
+ "change and it can be put through the NFS tree without causing us any\n"
+ "problems...\n"
+ "\n"
+ "Cheers,\n"
+ "\n"
+ "Dave.\n"
+ "-- \n"
+ "Dave Chinner\n"
+ david@fromorbit.com
 
-2f2ec8c9408e0310f9c06bc086d23867f2a342a3105205d86627ee7417239e78
+cbf3026b87963f1f9e5a4a2efe81e81fb1921ff0baa39aca74aee7133d7079d9

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.