From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Piotr =?utf-8?B?RGHFgmVr?= Subject: Re: drop i386 support Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:32:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20160711073205.GA14502@predictor> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from predictor.org.pl ([185.5.97.54]:43300 "EHLO predictor.org.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030311AbcGKHcF (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 03:32:05 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:57:12PM +0800, kefu chai wrote: > Hi Cephers, >=20 > I am proposing drop the support of i386. as we don't compile Ceph wit= h > any i386 gitbuilder now[1] and hence don't test the i386 builds on > sepia on a regular basis. Also, based on the assumption that people > don't use i386 in production, I think we can drop it from the minimum > hardware document[2]? >=20 > And we won't explicitly disable the i386 build in code if we decide t= o > drop the i386 support, as we always try to be portable if possible. > But just don't claim the i386 as the officially supported arch > anymore. >=20 > What do you think? +1 from my side. Regular users are on amd64, and those willing to run o= n small devices are using ARM anyway. --=20 Piotr Da=C5=82ek branch@predictor.org.pl http://blog.predictor.org.pl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html