From: "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki" <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxl: trigger attach events for devices attached before xl devd startup
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:56:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160711085604.GA31462@mail-itl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160711083117.r675kyztqrz5elob@mac>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4993 bytes --]
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:31:17AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 07:35:47PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > When this daemon is started after creating backend device, that device
> > will not be configured.
> >
> > Racy situation:
> > 1. driver domain is started
> > 2. frontend domain is started (just after kicking driver domain off)
> > 3. device in frontend domain is connected to the backend (as specified
> > in frontend domain configuration)
> > 4. xl devd is started in driver domain
> >
> > End result is that backend device in driver domain is not configured
> > (like network interface is not enabled), so the device doesn't work.
> >
> > Fix this by artifically triggering events for devices already present in
> > xenstore before xl devd is started. Do this only after xenstore watch is
> > already registered, and only for devices not already initialized (in
> > XenbusStateInitWait state).
>
> Thanks!
>
> > Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
> > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
> > ---
> > tools/libxl/libxl.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl.c b/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> > index 1c81239..99815a7 100644
> > --- a/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> > +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> > @@ -4743,8 +4743,16 @@ int libxl_device_events_handler(libxl_ctx *ctx,
> > uint32_t domid;
> > libxl__ddomain ddomain;
> > char *be_path;
> > + char **kinds = NULL, **domains = NULL, **devs = NULL;
> > + const char *sstate;
> > + char *state_path;
> > + int state;
> > + unsigned int nkinds, ndomains, ndevs;
> > + int i, j, k;
> > + xs_transaction_t t;
> >
> > ddomain.ao = ao;
> > + FILLZERO(ddomain.watch);
>
> Is this a different bugfix or stray change?
To cleanly unregister watch and not do nothing if wasn't registered at
all. If it isn't initialized, libxl__ev_xswatch_deregister call on
not registered watch isn't harmless.
> > LIBXL_SLIST_INIT(&ddomain.guests);
> >
> > rc = libxl__get_domid(gc, &domid);
> > @@ -4762,9 +4770,41 @@ int libxl_device_events_handler(libxl_ctx *ctx,
> > be_path);
> > if (rc) goto out;
> >
> > + rc = libxl__xs_transaction_start(gc, &t);
> > + if (rc) goto out;
>
> Why do you need to start a transaction here if you end up aborting it when
> finished?
Mostly to ease error checking. Because below code does three level
listing, I don't want to deal with races where some entry was removed
between those calls, at least not here. Like this:
xs_directory('backend/vif') -> 3, 4, 5
xs_directory('backend/vif/3') -> 0, 1
xs_read('backend/vif/3/0/state') -> ...
xs_read('backend/vif/3/1/state') -> ...
toolstack removes backend/vif/4 here
xs_directory('backend/vif/4') -> fail
Of course backend_watch_callback would fail anyway in such a case, which
is ok. But having snapshot of xenstore during this multi-level listing
looks like avoiding some corner cases during listing itself.
> > + kinds = libxl__xs_directory(gc, t, be_path, &nkinds);
> > + if (kinds) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < nkinds; i++) {
> > + domains = libxl__xs_directory(gc, t,
> > + GCSPRINTF("%s/%s", be_path, kinds[i]), &ndomains);
> > + if (!domains)
> > + continue;
> > + for (j = 0; j < ndomains; j++) {
> > + devs = libxl__xs_directory(gc, t,
> > + GCSPRINTF("%s/%s/%s", be_path, kinds[i], domains[j]), &ndevs);
> > + if (!devs)
> > + continue;
> > + for (k = 0; k < ndevs; k++) {
> > + state_path = GCSPRINTF("%s/%s/%s/%s/state",
> > + be_path, kinds[i], domains[j], devs[k]);
> > + rc = libxl__xs_read_checked(gc, t, state_path, &sstate);
> > + if (rc)
> > + continue;
> > + state = atoi(sstate);
> > + if (state == XenbusStateInitWait)
> > + backend_watch_callback(egc, &ddomain.watch,
> > + be_path, state_path);
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + libxl__xs_transaction_abort(gc, &t);
> > +
> > return AO_INPROGRESS;
> >
> > out:
> > + libxl__ev_xswatch_deregister(gc, &ddomain.watch);
>
> This seems to be part of a different bugfix also.
No, this code previously wasn't reachable if xswatch was correctly
registered.
--
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 127 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-11 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-10 17:35 [PATCH] libxl: trigger attach events for devices attached before xl devd startup Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2016-07-11 8:31 ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-07-11 8:56 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki [this message]
2016-07-11 9:43 ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-07-11 9:49 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2016-07-11 10:00 ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-07-11 10:44 ` [PATCH v2] " Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2016-07-11 10:53 ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-07-14 9:36 ` Wei Liu
2016-07-15 23:47 ` [PATCH v3] " Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2016-07-18 15:31 ` Wei Liu
2016-07-19 13:20 ` Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160711085604.GA31462@mail-itl \
--to=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.