All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] libxl: update vcpus bitmap in retrieved guest config
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:31:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160711113143.GG7019@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22399.59004.935094.420724@mariner.uk.xensource.com>

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 06:44:28PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wei Liu writes ("[PATCH v3 4/5] libxl: update vcpus bitmap in retrieved guest config"):
> > ... because the available vcpu bitmap can change during domain life time
> > due to cpu hotplug and unplug.
> > 
> > For QEMU upstream, we interrogate QEMU for the number of vcpus. For
> > others, we look directly into xenstore for information.
> ...
> > +static int libxl__update_avail_vcpus_qmp(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid,
> > +                                         unsigned int max_vcpus,
> > +                                         libxl_bitmap *map)
> > +{
> > +    int rc;
> > +
> > +    /* For QEMU upstream we always need to return the number
> > +     * of cpus present to QEMU whether they are online or not;
> > +     * otherwise QEMU won't accept the saved state.
> 
> This comment is confusing to me.  Perhaps `return' should read
> `provide' ?  But the connection between the body of this function and
> the comment is still obscure.
> 

"provide" is ok.

To avoid confusion the comment can be moved a few line above to describe
the function, not the code snippet. Does that work better?

> > +static int libxl__update_avail_vcpus_xenstore(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid,
> > +                                              unsigned int max_vcpus,
> > +                                              libxl_bitmap *map)
> > +{
> > +    int rc;
> > +    unsigned int i;
> > +    const char *dompath;
> ...
> > +    for (i = 0; i < max_vcpus; i++) {
> > +        const char *path = GCSPRINTF("%s/cpu/%u/availability", dompath, i);
> > +        const char *content = libxl__xs_read(gc, XBT_NULL, path);
> > +        if (!strcmp(content, "online"))
> > +            libxl_bitmap_set(map, i);
> 
> Firstly, this should be libxl__xs_read_checked.  Secondly if "content"
> is NULL, this will crash.
> 

Will fix.

> > @@ -7294,6 +7341,55 @@ int libxl_retrieve_domain_configuration(libxl_ctx *ctx, uint32_t domid,
> >          libxl_dominfo_dispose(&info);
> >      }
> >  
> > +    /* VCPUs */
> > +    {
> > +        libxl_bitmap *map = &d_config->b_info.avail_vcpus;
> > +        unsigned int max_vcpus = d_config->b_info.max_vcpus;
> > +        libxl_device_model_version version;
> > +
> > +        libxl_bitmap_dispose(map);
> > +        libxl_bitmap_init(map);
> > +        libxl_bitmap_alloc(CTX, map, max_vcpus);
> > +        libxl_bitmap_set_none(map);
> 
> I see that this function already trashes the domain config when it
> fails (leaving it up to the caller to free the partial config) but
> that this is not documented :-/.

d_config is an out parameter. User can't expect the returned d_config to
be valid if this API returns error state. And user is still responsible
for calling _init before calling this API and _dispose afterwards. So
this still fits into how we expect libxl types to be used. Nothing new
needs to be documented.

All other fields are already handled in this way.

> 
> > +        /* If the user did not explicitly specify a device model
> > +         * version, we need to use the same logic used during domain
> > +         * creation to derive the device model version.
> > +         */
> > +        version = d_config->b_info.device_model_version;
> > +        if (version == LIBXL_DEVICE_MODEL_VERSION_UNKNOWN)
> > +            version = libxl__get_device_model_version(gc, &d_config->b_info);
> 
> I think this is rather unfortunate.  Won't changing the default device
> model while the domain is running will cause this function to give
> wrong answers ?

I think saving the device model into the template should work. No need
to derive it during runtime.

Wei.

> 
> Thanks,
> Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-11 11:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-15  9:31 [PATCH v3 0/5] libxl: libxl: update available vcpus map in retrieve configuration function Wei Liu
2016-06-15  9:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] libxl: libxl_domain_need_memory shouldn't modify b_info Wei Liu
2016-06-15 13:31   ` Dario Faggioli
2016-06-15 13:38     ` Wei Liu
2016-07-08 17:35   ` Ian Jackson
2016-07-11 11:03     ` Wei Liu
2016-06-15  9:31 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] libxl: factor out libxl__get_device_modlel_version Wei Liu
2016-06-15 13:27   ` Dario Faggioli
2016-06-15 17:04   ` Anthony PERARD
2016-07-08 17:37   ` Ian Jackson
2016-06-15  9:31 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] libxl: introduce libxl__qmp_query_cpus Wei Liu
2016-06-15 13:26   ` Dario Faggioli
2016-06-15 16:48   ` Anthony PERARD
2016-07-08 17:45   ` Ian Jackson
2016-06-15  9:31 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] libxl: update vcpus bitmap in retrieved guest config Wei Liu
2016-06-15 17:20   ` Anthony PERARD
2016-07-08 17:44   ` Ian Jackson
2016-07-11 11:31     ` Wei Liu [this message]
2016-07-11 14:59       ` Wei Liu
2016-06-15  9:31 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] libxl: only issue cpu-add call to QEMU for not present CPU Wei Liu
2016-07-08 17:48   ` Ian Jackson
2016-07-11 11:32     ` Wei Liu
2016-07-02 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] libxl: libxl: update available vcpus map in retrieve configuration function Wei Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160711113143.GG7019@citrix.com \
    --to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.