From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:50917 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752036AbcGLQek (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:34:40 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u6CGSomO002656 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:34:39 -0400 Received: from e17.ny.us.ibm.com (e17.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.207]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2448qm0du6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:34:39 -0400 Received: from localhost by e17.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:34:38 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.27]) by d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB4F38C804F for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:34:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u6CGYdOO55640306 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:34:39 GMT Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u6CGYZqh017525 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:34:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 09:34:54 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: Suggestion on labels of "Pre-BSD Routing Table" scaling figures Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <6a019120-d54f-dbe3-cfa5-1565ae27e7d3@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6a019120-d54f-dbe3-cfa5-1565ae27e7d3@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20160712163454.GT7094@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: perfbook-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Akira Yokosawa Cc: perfbook@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:32:01AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Thanks to your addition in Chapter 9, it is getting more and more > convincing. Glad you like them! A little more to go... > However, the X-axis label in Figures 9.5, 9.9, and 9.16 is > "Number of CPUs/Threads." > At first glance, I read it as "Number of CPUs per Threads." > It took a few seconds for me to realize that it means > "Number of CPUs or Threads." > > In Figure 4.10, the x-axis label is "Number of CPUs (Threads)." > I think this is better to avoid ambiguity. > > What do you think? Sold!!! ;-) Made this change with your Signed-off-by. Thanx, Paul