From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
<stable-rt@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RT 5/8] arm: lazy preempt: correct resched condition
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:57:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160712165802.606359149@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20160712165749.741663758@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0005-arm-lazy-preempt-correct-resched-condition.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1193 bytes --]
3.10.102-rt113-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
If we get out of preempt_schedule_irq() then we check for NEED_RESCHED
and call the former function again if set because the preemption counter
has be zero at this point.
However the counter for lazy-preempt might not be zero therefore we have
to check the counter before looking at the need_resched_lazy flag.
Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
index 9b51e3faff52..06be94212de9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
@@ -234,7 +234,11 @@ svc_preempt:
bne 1b
tst r0, #_TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY
moveq pc, r8 @ go again
- b 1b
+ ldr r0, [tsk, #TI_PREEMPT_LAZY] @ get preempt lazy count
+ teq r0, #0 @ if preempt lazy count != 0
+ beq 1b
+ mov pc, r8 @ go again
+
#endif
__und_fault:
--
2.8.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-12 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-12 16:57 [PATCH RT 0/8] Linux 3.10.102-rt113-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 16:57 ` [PATCH RT 1/8] kvm, rt: change async pagefault code locking for PREEMPT_RT Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 16:57 ` [PATCH RT 2/8] net: dev: always take qdiscs busylock in __dev_xmit_skb() Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 16:57 ` [PATCH RT 3/8] list_bl: fixup bogus lockdep warning Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 16:57 ` [PATCH RT 4/8] kernel/printk: Dont try to print from IRQ/NMI region Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 16:57 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2016-07-12 16:57 ` [PATCH RT 6/8] trace: correct off by one while recording the trace-event Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 16:57 ` [PATCH RT 7/8] x86: Fix an RT MCE crash Steven Rostedt
2016-07-12 16:57 ` [PATCH RT 8/8] Linux 3.10.102-rt113-rc1 Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160712165802.606359149@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=stable-rt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.