From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ezequiel Garcia Subject: Re: Kernel stability on baytrail machines Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:41:58 -0300 Message-ID: <20160712194158.GA4834@laptop> References: <606d9b223f3c12775d108b98c4df72ae@feix.cz> <20160409160119.GA19362@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain> <20160409201417.4436d4bd@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160409201417.4436d4bd@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: One Thousand Gnomes Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Michal Feix , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Pavel Machek List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org SGkgQWxhbiwKCihBZGRpbmcgaW50ZXJlc3RlZCBwZW9wbGUgdG8gdGhpcyB0aHJlYWQpCgpPbiAw OSBBcHIgMDg6MTQgUE0sIE9uZSBUaG91c2FuZCBHbm9tZXMgd3JvdGU6Cj4gPiA+IEkgZG8gZmVl bCB0aGF0IHRoZSBpbXBvcnRhbmNlIG9mIHRoZSBtZW50aW9uZWQgYnVnIGlzIGN1cnJlbnRseQo+ ID4gPiB1bmRlcmVzdGltYXRlZC4gQ2FuIGFueW9uZSBoZXJlIGdpdmUgYSBub3RlLCBob3cgbXVj aCBjdXJyZW50IGxpbnV4Cj4gPiA+IGtlcm5lbCBpcyBzdXBwb3NlZCB0byBiZSBzdGFibGUgb24g Z2VuZXJhbCBiYXl0cmFpbCBtYWNoaW5lcz8gIAo+ID4gCj4gPiBJZiB5b3UgZGlkIG5vdCBnZXQg YW55IHJlcGxpZXMuLi4geW91IG1pZ2h0IHdhbnQgdG8gY2hlY2sgTUFJTlRBSU5FUlMgZmlsZSwg YW5kCj4gPiBwdXQgSW50ZWwgeDg2IG1haW50YWluZXJzIG9uIENjIGxpc3QuCj4gPiAKPiA+IEkn bSBzdXJlIHNvbWVvbmUgY2FyZXMgOi0pLgo+IAo+IFllcyB3ZSBjYXJlLCBhbmQgdGhlcmUgYXJl IHBlb3BsZSBsb29raW5nIGF0IHRoZSB2YXJpb3VzIHJlcG9ydHMuCj4gCgpBcmUgdGhlcmUgYW55 IHVwZGF0ZXMgb24gdGhlIHN0YXR1cyBvZiB0aGlzIGlzc3VlPwoKVGhlIGN1cnJlbnQgYnVnemls bGEgcmVwb3J0IFsxXSBtYXJrcyB0aGlzIGFzIGEgcG93ZXIgbWFuYWdlbWVudAppc3N1ZS4gSG93 ZXZlciwgbWFueSByZXBvcnRzIGluZGljYXRlIHRoYXQgaXQgd291bGQgb25seSBmcmVlemUKd2hl biBydW5uaW5nIFgsIHNvIGl0J3Mgbm90IGNvbXBsZXRlbHkgY2xlYXIgaWYgaXQncyByZWxhdGVk IHRvCnRoZSBnZnggZHJpdmVyIHRvby4KCkFsc28sIGRvIHdlIGtub3cgd2hpY2ggQ1BVcyBhcmUg YWZmZWN0IGJ5IHRoaXMgaXNzdWU/CmFuZCB3aGljaCBhcmUgTk9UIGFmZmVjdGVkIDopIC0gd291 bGQgYmUgcXVpdGUgcmVsZXZhbnQKaW4gcGlja2luZyBhIENQVSBmb3IgYSBwcm9kdWN0LgoKWzFd IGh0dHBzOi8vYnVnemlsbGEua2VybmVsLm9yZy9zaG93X2J1Zy5jZ2k/aWQ9MTA5MDUxCi0tIApF emVxdWllbCBHYXJjaWEsIFZhbmd1YXJkaWFTdXIKd3d3LnZhbmd1YXJkaWFzdXIuY29tLmFyCl9f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCmRyaS1kZXZlbCBt YWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKZHJpLWRldmVsQGxpc3RzLmZyZWVkZXNrdG9wLm9yZwpodHRwczovL2xpc3Rz LmZyZWVkZXNrdG9wLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2RyaS1kZXZlbAo= From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751832AbcGLTtF (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:49:05 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f182.google.com ([209.85.216.182]:36302 "EHLO mail-qt0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751193AbcGLTtD (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:49:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:41:58 -0300 From: Ezequiel Garcia To: One Thousand Gnomes Cc: Pavel Machek , Michal Feix , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: Kernel stability on baytrail machines Message-ID: <20160712194158.GA4834@laptop> References: <606d9b223f3c12775d108b98c4df72ae@feix.cz> <20160409160119.GA19362@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain> <20160409201417.4436d4bd@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160409201417.4436d4bd@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Alan, (Adding interested people to this thread) On 09 Apr 08:14 PM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > > > I do feel that the importance of the mentioned bug is currently > > > underestimated. Can anyone here give a note, how much current linux > > > kernel is supposed to be stable on general baytrail machines? > > > > If you did not get any replies... you might want to check MAINTAINERS file, and > > put Intel x86 maintainers on Cc list. > > > > I'm sure someone cares :-). > > Yes we care, and there are people looking at the various reports. > Are there any updates on the status of this issue? The current bugzilla report [1] marks this as a power management issue. However, many reports indicate that it would only freeze when running X, so it's not completely clear if it's related to the gfx driver too. Also, do we know which CPUs are affect by this issue? and which are NOT affected :) - would be quite relevant in picking a CPU for a product. [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109051 -- Ezequiel Garcia, VanguardiaSur www.vanguardiasur.com.ar