From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:19606 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751934AbcGMPuo (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:50:44 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u6DFnPgx007347 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:50:33 -0400 Received: from e17.ny.us.ibm.com (e17.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.207]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 24567cayt1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:50:32 -0400 Received: from localhost by e17.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:50:32 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.25]) by d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E00438C8039 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:50:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u6DFoUhR55443468 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 15:50:30 GMT Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u6DFoTb2015940 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:50:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 08:50:49 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: Suggestion on labels of "Pre-BSD Routing Table" scaling figures Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <6a019120-d54f-dbe3-cfa5-1565ae27e7d3@gmail.com> <20160712163454.GT7094@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <20160713155049.GH7094@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: perfbook-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Akira Yokosawa Cc: perfbook@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:37:35PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > On 2016/07/13 1:34, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:32:01AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > >>Hi Paul, > >> > >>Thanks to your addition in Chapter 9, it is getting more and more > >>convincing. > > > >Glad you like them! A little more to go... > > > >>However, the X-axis label in Figures 9.5, 9.9, and 9.16 is > >>"Number of CPUs/Threads." > >>At first glance, I read it as "Number of CPUs per Threads." > >>It took a few seconds for me to realize that it means > >>"Number of CPUs or Threads." > >> > >>In Figure 4.10, the x-axis label is "Number of CPUs (Threads)." > >>I think this is better to avoid ambiguity. > >> > >>What do you think? > > > >Sold!!! ;-) > > > >Made this change with your Signed-off-by. Make that Reported-by... > Hi, > > So, I searched "CPUs/Threads" in the pdf and 10 other labels hit. > See the list below. (Sorry, but with page numbers of 2 column pdf.) > > * p.38 Figure 5.3 > * p.77 Figure 6.22 > * p.78 Figure 6.23 and in the text just below > * p.166 Figures 10.7, 10.8, and 10.9 > * p.168 Figures 10.13 and 10.14 > * p.169 Figure 10.15 > * p.177 Figure 10.29 > > These figures existed before your recent rewrite of Chapter 9, > and I never found them ambiguous. So I might have been on a > different planet last night or something... > If you think it is still better to modify them, please consider > doing so. Might as well... Done! > There is another "CPUs/Threads" in p.437 at the definition of > "Linearizable," but it is not at all ambiguous in the context. Fixed that one as well. And added glossary.tex to the Makefile dependency list. ;-) Thanx, Paul