From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Snitzer Subject: Re: poor thin performance, relative to thick Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:59:07 -0400 Message-ID: <20160715185906.GA29580@redhat.com> References: <20160711204454.GA24378@helmut> <20160712184625.GA3691@redhat.com> <20160714042122.GB24221@helmut> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160714042122.GB24221@helmut> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Jon Bernard Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Thu, Jul 14 2016 at 12:21am -0400, Jon Bernard wrote: > Do you have any intuition on where to start looking? Joe asked me a very basic/obvious question: is block zeroing enabled? (block zeroing is enabled by default -- you have to know to disable it) If zeroing wasn't disabled that could explain some of the sizable performance differences. Please use/test the 'skip_block_zeroing' feature if you aren't already (also see the "Zeroing' section of the 'lvmthin' manpage). Mike