From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:12315 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751493AbcGRGx6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 02:53:58 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u6I6rv9Y029631 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 02:53:57 -0400 Received: from e18.ny.us.ibm.com (e18.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.208]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2482gdjx55-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 02:53:57 -0400 Received: from localhost by e18.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 02:53:53 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.26]) by d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F1A38C8039 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 02:53:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u6I6roRh62193780 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 06:53:50 GMT Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u6I6roCF018072 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 02:53:50 -0400 Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 23:54:14 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH] qqz: Add another hyperlink to black box in QQA Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <0bf67306-7169-4ce5-ca66-b68c2833ee99@gmail.com> <20160717215900.GD7094@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <731d8ed0-deae-e159-a889-ba38822011e8@gmail.com> <20160717233606.GE7094@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <113d52db-a2b8-8900-8163-576e8129877f@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <113d52db-a2b8-8900-8163-576e8129877f@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20160718065414.GF7094@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: perfbook-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Akira Yokosawa Cc: perfbook@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 08:58:59AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > On 2016/07/18 8:36, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 07:54:27AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > >>On 2016/07/17 14:59:00 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >>>On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 02:50:04PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > >>>>From 2a74b30f0a1d036e45c6aa5ef431034c23f790db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >>>>From: Akira Yokosawa > >>>>Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 20:28:08 +0900 > >>>>Subject: [PATCH] qqz: Add another hyperlink to black box in QQA > >>>> > >>>>This commit adds another cross-link to the black boxes in QQA. > >>>>I think this change would meet readers' expectation. > >>>> > >>>>Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa > >>> > >>>I agree! For reasons that are not clear to me, I had to hand-apply > >>>this patch. Might have been a white-space issue, which I did not > >>>think to check for... > >>> > >>>Please take a look at the patch below to make sure that I did it > >>>correctly. > >> > >>Yes, you did it right. I'm wondering what was wrong on my side. > > > >My guess is whitespace. Or maybe the email got mangled along the way. > > > >>>Also, this suggests a possibility: In the quick-quiz answer, suppose > >>>that the heading and the black box link (as they do now) to the beginning > >>>of the quick-quiz question, but that the white box links to the end > >>>(or just after the end) of the quick-quiz question. That way, the > >>>reader could choose the return point. > >>> > >>>Would that make sense? > >> > >>Well, yes if readers expect the behavior. > >>But for long answers, there are cases where you can choose only the white > >>boxes in your view. I'm hesitating because of your reaction to the first > >>attempt the other day. > > > >All good points! > > > >>Anyway, I'm going to submit a patch for you to try. > >> > >>Also we'd also need to update the explanation in the answer of Quick Quiz 1.3 > >>if we actually do the change. > > > >Looking forward to it! > > So, I'm submitting 2 versions of patch in reply to this mail. > 1st one makes "the white box link to the end the quick-quiz question." > 2nd one makes "the white box link to just after the end of the quick-quiz > question." > > Both of them are relative to current master. > Please compare them and let me know which one you like. > Or just apply the one you choose. > > Then I'll compose the additional explanation according to your choice. Before I do that -- which of the two do you prefer? Thanx, Paul