From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36583) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bP2Wr-0002hB-Jk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 02:59:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bP2Wq-0003a5-Kd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 02:59:49 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:59:40 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20160718065940.GC12317@ad.usersys.redhat.com> References: <1464928382-9650-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <1464928382-9650-5-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <0be7d99e-70d7-a0d4-6707-fc8cb741e134@redhat.com> <92b1a9fa-4f41-41cf-0140-bb0cf04355a9@redhat.com> <52c16555-c651-32cc-7297-89f1775bdfc1@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 04/10] block: Support meta dirty bitmap List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz Cc: John Snow , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , qemu-block@nongnu.org On Fri, 07/15 14:10, Max Reitz wrote: >=20 > I just remembered that it's very much justified now, as you have only > recently adopted this series. >=20 > It's just always funny to get a =E2=80=9CWhat are you talking about?=E2= =80=9D reply to > some nagging I sent out long enough in the past that I can't even > remember myself, so I have to look it up, too. >=20 > Sorry :-) This is my fault, the delays were mostly because the motivation of this s= eries went away from my hands (QBM) and I handed it off to John not quite promp= tedly. Fam