From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 05:48:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160719034806.GA1640@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2565257.LbcJLfl1sl@vostro.rjw.lan>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 772 bytes --]
> > Well, not knowing much about ACPI, I just need the conflict resolution
> > for my latest i2c/for-next and your above branch. If you want to do it,
> > fine with me. But maybe Jarkko will be back to office on Monday, too.
>
> Unfortunately, I don't see how these branches can be merged in a sensible
> way without adding too much new code into the merge itself.
>
> Something needs to be dropped and then rebased and applied again.
Okay, I'll drop the I2C parts. Next to the core parts which I will drop,
there was also a driver patch making use of the core changes for which I
requested some updates. Since those did not happen yet (Jarkko on
holiday?), the core patches alone are not important anyhow.
Thanks for looking into it!
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-19 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-15 2:17 linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-15 2:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-15 12:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-15 12:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-07-15 12:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-15 12:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-17 18:14 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-07-19 2:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-19 3:48 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2016-07-19 12:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-25 12:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-09-29 12:18 broonie
2022-10-05 0:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-05 7:12 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-02-07 23:11 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-29 2:09 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-30 7:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-11 23:27 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-12 12:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-01-06 1:39 Stephen Rothwell
2016-01-06 2:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-01-06 8:20 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160719034806.GA1640@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=octavian.purdila@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.