From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [RFC ABI V2 2/8] RDMA/core: Refactor IDR to be per-device Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:41:22 -0600 Message-ID: <20160720174122.GJ21460@obsidianresearch.com> References: <1468941812-32286-1-git-send-email-matanb@mellanox.com> <1468941812-32286-3-git-send-email-matanb@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1468941812-32286-3-git-send-email-matanb-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Matan Barak Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Doug Ledford , Sean Hefty , Liran Liss , Haggai Eran , Tal Alon , Majd Dibbiny , Christoph Lameter , Leon Romanovsky List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 06:23:26PM +0300, Matan Barak wrote: > From: Leon Romanovsky > > The current code creates an IDR per type. Since types are currently > common for all vendors and known in advance, this was good enough. > However, the proposed ioctl based infrastructure allows each vendor > to declare only some of the common types and declare its own specific > types. > > Thus, we decided to implement IDR to be per device and refactor it to > use a new file. I still think this should be per-fd... Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html