From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
David Frey <david.frey@sensirion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: sht3x: set initial jiffies to last_update
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:10:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160721081046.0f658c18@endymion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKzfze82xFRU6A09rXS3OhtLU99cZt_2waRcFGvTgWbx9huZLA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Matt,
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 17:22:10 -0700, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> wrote:
> > On jeu., 2016-07-07 at 19:46 -0700, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> >> Handling the wraparound requires the data->last_update to be set to an
> >> initial jiffies value. Otherwise you can start in a state where the
> >> sensor will never request a reading.
> >
> > I can't see how. As I read the code, in the worst case, readings can be
> > blocked for interval_ms (2 seconds maximum.)
>
> On 64-bit systems this is never an issue because the jiffies counter
> will never wrap around.
>
> But my system is a 32-bit ARM core, so the the kernel sets the initial
> value to 0xfffb6c20 so it will wrap around in 5 minutes to find buggy
> code.
>
> So looking at time_after(0xfffb6c20, 0) will return false always till
> it finally rolls over.
I've always been confused by how jiffies wrapping is handled. So I
tested it, and you are correct.
> >> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> >> Cc: David Frey <david.frey@sensirion.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/hwmon/sht3x.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/sht3x.c b/drivers/hwmon/sht3x.c
> >> index 450645b6053d..05a925257938 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/hwmon/sht3x.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/sht3x.c
> >> @@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ static int sht3x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >> data->setup.blocking_io = false;
> >> data->setup.high_precision = true;
> >> data->mode = 0;
> >> - data->last_update = 0;
> >> + data->last_update = jiffies;
> >> data->client = client;
> >> crc8_populate_msb(sht3x_crc8_table, SHT3X_CRC8_POLYNOMIAL);
> >>
> >
> > Both look equally wrong to me. With your proposal, accessing the sysfs
> > attributes right after loading the driver will not trigger a reading.
> >
> > In order to guarantee that the first access will trigger a reading,
> > data->last_update should be initialized to jiffies -
> > msecs_to_jiffies(2000) (the maximum interval value.)
>
> Ok that is fine. Rather do jiffies + (2 * HZ)
2 * HZ is fine. But it's minus, not plus. You want to initialize the
last update time to 2 seconds BEFORE the driver is being loaded, so
that the current time is at least 2 seconds AFTER the (fake) last
update at first access. And you should subtract another jiffy to be on
the safe side.
Can you please send an updated patch?
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-21 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-08 2:46 [PATCH] hwmon: sht3x: set initial jiffies to last_update Matt Ranostay
2016-07-08 7:56 ` Jean Delvare
2016-07-09 0:22 ` Matt Ranostay
2016-07-21 6:10 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2016-07-24 23:50 ` Matt Ranostay
2016-07-25 8:42 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160721081046.0f658c18@endymion \
--to=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=david.frey@sensirion.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mranostay@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.