From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35753) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQagR-0007TL-9H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:40:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQagP-0002Ic-7d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:40:06 -0400 Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([2001:bc8:30d7:100::1]:50209) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQagP-0002IQ-0m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:40:05 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:40:02 +0200 From: Aurelien Jarno Message-ID: <20160722134002.GA7630@aurel32.net> References: <1466740107-15042-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/9] Third try at fixing sparc register allocation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 2016-07-19 09:09, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 06/24/2016 09:18 AM, Richard Henderson wrote: > > I was unhappy about the complexity of the second try. > > > > Better to convert to normal temps, allowing in rare > > occasions, spilling the "globals" to the stack in order > > to satisfy register allocation. > > > > I can no longer provoke an allocation failure on i686. > > Hopefully this fixes the OpenBSD case that Mark mentioned > > re the second attempt. > > Ping for review. It would be nice to have this fixed for 2.7, but this is > complex enough I'd prefer another set of eyes. I'll try to have a look during the week-end. Sorry about the delay. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net