From: Matt Fleming <matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
sylvain.chouleur-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] efi interruptible runtime services
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:58:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160725155820.GD31759@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1468611391-4039-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, 15 Jul, at 09:36:28PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> This is a resend of the generic part of the series 'efi interruptible runtime
> services', of which v3 was sent out on January 13th. I have added an additional
> patch on top which gives runtime-wrappers.c the same treatment as efivars.c,
> i.e., replacing the spinlock with a semaphore.
>
> v2: rebase onto v4.7-rc3
> pr_warn() on failure to acquire the rt services semaphore before invoking
> the reset_system runtime service
> map EFI_ABORTED onto -EINTR
>
> v3: drop lockdep_assert_xxx() calls (#2)
>
> Ard Biesheuvel (1):
> efi: replace runtime services spinlock with semaphore
>
> Sylvain Chouleur (2):
> efi: use a file local lock for efivars
> efi: don't use spinlocks for efi vars
Thanks Ard, applied for v4.9.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-25 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-15 19:36 [PATCH v3 0/3] efi interruptible runtime services Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <1468611391-4039-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-15 19:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] efi: use a file local lock for efivars Ard Biesheuvel
2016-07-15 19:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] efi: don't use spinlocks for efi vars Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <1468611391-4039-3-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-25 15:43 ` Matt Fleming
2016-07-15 19:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] efi: replace runtime services spinlock with semaphore Ard Biesheuvel
2016-07-25 15:58 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-15 19:35 [PATCH v3 0/3] efi interruptible runtime services Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-06 22:33 [PATCH v2 " Sylvain Chouleur
2016-01-13 16:32 ` [PATCH v3 " Sylvain Chouleur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160725155820.GD31759@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--to=matt-mf/unelci9gs6ibeejttw/xrex20p6io@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sylvain.chouleur-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.