From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org, svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make system_reset_pSeries relocatable
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 23:57:28 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160727135728.GC3720@350D> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160727215003.16b9feaf@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com>
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 09:50:03PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 17:32:06 +1000
> Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE
> > + b power7_wakeup_common
> > +#else
> > + /*
> > + * We can't just use a direct branch to power7_wakeup_common
> > + * because the distance from here to there depends on where
> > + * the kernel ends up being put.
> > + */
> > + mfctr r11
> > + ld r10, PACAKBASE(r13)
> > + LOAD_HANDLER(r10, power7_wakeup_common)
> > + mtctr r10
> > + bctr
> > #endif
>
> So r10 and r11 are safe to use (as well as existing registers
> being used without saving) because we are returning via the nap
> functions that caller will expect te trash volatile registers,
> yes?
>
r10, r11 are volatile as per the ABI, so yes.
> In that caie I can't see a problem with this.
>
Thanks for the review
Balbir
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-27 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-27 7:32 [PATCH] Make system_reset_pSeries relocatable Balbir Singh
2016-07-27 9:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-07-27 10:01 ` Balbir Singh
2016-07-27 11:51 ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-07-27 10:12 ` kbuild test robot
2016-07-27 11:34 ` Balbir Singh
2016-07-27 11:50 ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-07-27 13:57 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160727135728.GC3720@350D \
--to=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.