From: Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
To: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
Cc: hskinnemoen@gmail.com, robert.jarzmik@free.fr,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0011/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:38:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160802113807.GA3822@samfundet.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160802103407.14486-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Around Tue 02 Aug 2016 18:34:07 +0800 or thereabout, Baole Ni wrote:
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
Fine by me.
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
> ---
> arch/avr32/kernel/cpu.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/avr32/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/avr32/kernel/cpu.c
> index 0341ae2..c4c96af 100644
> --- a/arch/avr32/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/avr32/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -171,12 +171,12 @@ static ssize_t store_pcenable(struct device *dev,
> return count;
> }
>
> -static DEVICE_ATTR(pc0event, 0600, show_pc0event, store_pc0event);
> -static DEVICE_ATTR(pc0count, 0600, show_pc0count, store_pc0count);
> -static DEVICE_ATTR(pc1event, 0600, show_pc1event, store_pc1event);
> -static DEVICE_ATTR(pc1count, 0600, show_pc1count, store_pc1count);
> -static DEVICE_ATTR(pccycles, 0600, show_pccycles, store_pccycles);
> -static DEVICE_ATTR(pcenable, 0600, show_pcenable, store_pcenable);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(pc0event, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, show_pc0event, store_pc0event);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(pc0count, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, show_pc0count, store_pc0count);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(pc1event, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, show_pc1event, store_pc1event);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(pc1count, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, show_pc1count, store_pc1count);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(pccycles, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, show_pccycles, store_pccycles);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(pcenable, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, show_pcenable, store_pcenable);
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_PERFORMANCE_COUNTERS */
--
Best regards,
Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-02 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-02 10:34 [PATCH 0011/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni
2016-08-02 11:38 ` Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160802113807.GA3822@samfundet.no \
--to=egtvedt@samfundet.no \
--cc=baolex.ni@intel.com \
--cc=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=hskinnemoen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.