From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/edid: Clean up display_info stuff
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:20:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160803072035.GF4329@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160803070815.23871.68940@emeril.freedesktop.org>
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 07:08:15AM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/edid: Clean up display_info stuff
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/10580/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Series 10580v1 drm/edid: Clean up display_info stuff
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/10580/revisions/1/mbox
>
> Test kms_cursor_legacy:
> Subgroup basic-flip-vs-cursor-legacy:
> fail -> PASS (ro-skl3-i5-6260u)
> pass -> FAIL (fi-skl-i7-6700k)
(kms_cursor_legacy:11679) DEBUG: Test requirement passed: target > 1
(kms_cursor_legacy:11679) DEBUG: Using a target of 128 cursor updates per half-vblank
(kms_cursor_legacy:11679) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function basic_flip_vs_cursor, file kms_cursor_legacy.c:514:
(kms_cursor_legacy:11679) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: get_vblank(display->drm_fd, pipe, 0) == vblank_start
(kms_cursor_legacy:11679) CRITICAL: error: 11334 != 11333
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97188
> Subgroup basic-flip-vs-cursor-varying-size:
> fail -> PASS (ro-bdw-i5-5250u)
> Test kms_flip:
> Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
> pass -> FAIL (ro-byt-n2820)
(kms_flip:7862) DEBUG: name = flip
last_ts = 518.830009
last_received_ts = 518.830101
last_seq = 1441
current_ts = 519.096530
current_received_ts = 519.108069
current_seq = 1457
count = 8
seq_step = 1
(kms_flip:7862) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_state, file kms_flip.c:706:
(kms_flip:7862) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: fabs((usec_diff - usec_interflip) / usec_interflip) <= 0.005
(kms_flip:7862) CRITICAL: Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl for device
(kms_flip:7862) CRITICAL: inter-flip ts jitter: 0.266521, expected 0.166667
Still not 100% sure what's causing this. I suspect we got delayed prior to/while
issuing the flip/wait_vblank ioctl, and thus also the event gets delayed.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95236
> Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
> Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
> incomplete -> PASS (fi-skl-i7-6700k)
> Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
> pass -> INCOMPLETE (fi-hsw-i7-4770k)
Machine died or something. Last thing in dmesg is:
[ 432.932711] kms_pipe_crc_basic: starting subtest suspend-read-crc-pipe-B
>
> fi-hsw-i7-4770k total:207 pass:186 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
> fi-kbl-qkkr total:240 pass:182 dwarn:29 dfail:0 fail:3 skip:26
> fi-skl-i5-6260u total:240 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:14
> fi-skl-i7-6700k total:240 pass:208 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:4 skip:28
> fi-snb-i7-2600 total:240 pass:198 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:42
> ro-bdw-i5-5250u total:240 pass:220 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16
> ro-bdw-i7-5557U total:240 pass:223 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:16
> ro-bdw-i7-5600u total:240 pass:207 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:32
> ro-bsw-n3050 total:240 pass:194 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:4 skip:42
> ro-byt-n2820 total:240 pass:196 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:4 skip:40
> ro-hsw-i3-4010u total:240 pass:214 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26
> ro-ilk-i7-620lm total:240 pass:173 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:65
> ro-ilk1-i5-650 total:235 pass:173 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:60
> ro-ivb-i7-3770 total:240 pass:205 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35
> ro-ivb2-i7-3770 total:240 pass:209 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31
> ro-skl3-i5-6260u total:240 pass:223 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:3 skip:14
> ro-snb-i7-2620M total:240 pass:197 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:41
> ro-hsw-i7-4770r failed to connect after reboot
>
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_1674/
>
> aa8628c drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-08m-02d-14h-10m-12s UTC integration manifest
> 6e847fb drm/i915: Account for sink max TMDS clock when checking the port clock
> 9a3e409 drm/i915: Replace a bunch of connector->base.display_info with a local variable
> 762796f drm/edid: Move dvi_dual/max_tmds_clock parsing out from drm_edid_to_eld()
> e291c32 drm/edid: Clear the old cea_rev when there's no CEA extension in the new EDID
> dcaed19 drm/edid: Reduce the number of times we parse the CEA extension block
> dcd4f28 drm/edid: Don't pass around drm_display_info needlessly
> 0b2bf83 drm/edid: Move dvi_dual/max_tmds_clock to drm_display_info
> 91e01e3 drm/edid: Make max_tmds_clock kHz instead of MHz
> 048bb06 drm/edid: Clear old dvi_dual/max_tmds_clock before parsing the new EDID
> 8d15b3f drm/edid: Clear old audio latency values before parsing the new EDID
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-03 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-03 6:33 [PATCH 00/10] drm/edid: Clean up display_info stuff ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/edid: Clear old audio latency values before parsing the new EDID ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/edid: Clear old dvi_dual/max_tmds_clock " ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/edid: Make max_tmds_clock kHz instead of MHz ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/edid: Move dvi_dual/max_tmds_clock to drm_display_info ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/edid: Don't pass around drm_display_info needlessly ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/edid: Reduce the number of times we parse the CEA extension block ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/edid: Clear the old cea_rev when there's no CEA extension in the new EDID ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/edid: Move dvi_dual/max_tmds_clock parsing out from drm_edid_to_eld() ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Replace a bunch of connector->base.display_info with a local variable ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 6:33 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Account for sink max TMDS clock when checking the port clock ville.syrjala
2016-08-03 7:08 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/edid: Clean up display_info stuff Patchwork
2016-08-03 7:20 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2016-08-03 11:55 ` [PATCH 00/10] " Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160803072035.GF4329@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.