From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Use drm_crtc_vblank_wait_one_vblank instead the legacy one.
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 10:52:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160804075228.GZ4329@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lh0doug5.fsf@intel.com>
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:38:02AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Aug 2016, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> wrote:
> > No functional change.
> >
> > This is the last user of legacy function so we will be able
> > to clean up drm_irq.c a bit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > index 50cdc89..37a3ae8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > @@ -1202,7 +1202,10 @@ intel_crtc_has_dp_encoder(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > static inline void
> > intel_wait_for_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
> > {
> > - drm_wait_one_vblank(dev, pipe);
> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > + struct drm_crtc *crtc = dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe];
> > +
> > + drm_crtc_wait_one_vblank(crtc);
>
> With these changes, in almost all intel_wait_for_vblank() call paths
> we'll have crtc available, so we end up calling
> intel_wait_for_vblank(intel_crtc->pipe), which will then be converted
> back to drm_crtc via dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe], and again to
> pipe using drm_crtc_index(crtc)...
>
> I'm tempted to say we should *first* replace all intel_wait_for_vblank()
> calls with drm_crtc_wait_one_vblank() where possible. After that, we
> might just call
> drm_crtc_wait_one_vblank(dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe])
> everywhere else.
On a slight tangent, I'd like to see patches to
s/dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe]/whatever_is_the_function_name(pipe)/
and make those functions return intel_crtc instead of drm_crtc.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-04 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-03 21:17 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Use drm_crtc_vblank_wait_one_vblank instead the legacy one Rodrigo Vivi
2016-08-03 21:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm: Remove legacy drm_wait_one_vblank(dev, pipe) Rodrigo Vivi
2016-08-04 5:40 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Use drm_crtc_vblank_wait_one_vblank instead the legacy one Patchwork
2016-08-04 7:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] " Jani Nikula
2016-08-04 7:52 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160804075228.GZ4329@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.