From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758009AbcHDJZy (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 4 Aug 2016 05:25:54 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:36890 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S933403AbcHDJZo (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 4 Aug 2016 05:25:44 -0400
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 10:25:32 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
To: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>,
        Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix EFI callbacks on UV during kexec
Message-ID: <20160804092532.GJ3636@codeblueprint.co.uk>
References: <1469572713-113354-1-git-send-email-athorlton@sgi.com>
 <20160801133926.GG3636@codeblueprint.co.uk>
 <20160801143410.GJ5939@stormcage.americas.sgi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160801143410.GJ5939@stormcage.americas.sgi.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24+41 (02bc14ed1569) (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 01 Aug, at 09:34:10AM, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> 
> Hmm...   That's a good point.  It certainly would be nice for us to have
> those mappings in the kexec kernel, at least for the time being.  If
> you're not opposed to it, I can write up the patch.  Pretty sure it's a
> one-liner.

If it's that trivial, sure, please go ahead and submit.